Locomotive Distributed Control Redundancy via Segmented Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional locomotive control systems face complexity, high costs, and lack of robust, scalable, and flexible architecture due to centralized components, leading to inefficient communication and maintenance challenges.

Innovation Solution

A distributed control system with a network of electronic modules communicatively coupled in a standardized scalable architecture, allowing for programmable and reconfigurable control of locomotive functions, with redundant modules to handle failures and maintain operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a centralized computer-based control system is used, then a consolidated interface for the locomotive operator is provided, but the system complexity increases and robustness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsolidated interfaceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent electronic modules (e.g., TRW module, HMI module, COM module, PIG module) that are distributed throughout the locomotive. Each module handles specific control functions independently, reducing the complexity of any single centralized unit while maintaining operational consolidation through standardized network communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a centralized computer-based control system is used, then control functions are integrated, but the lack of robust and scalable components increases cost and reduces flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidcomponent standardization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A standardized electronic module architecture is implemented where modules can be programmed to perform multiple functions through software configuration. The same physical module type can be assigned different control tasks (e.g., TRW module for traction, HMI module for user interface) allowing the system to adapt to various operational requirements without requiring different hardware components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses programmable modules that can be dynamically reconfigured through software updates and reprogramming. This allows the system to adapt its control functions based on changing operational needs, mission requirements, or failure conditions without physical hardware modifications, thereby increasing flexibility and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If redundant modules are added to handle failures, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure toleranceVSAvoidmodule quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Redundant electronic modules are pre-configured and positioned within the system before failures occur. The system architecture includes backup modules that stand ready to assume control functions automatically when primary modules fail, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making during failure events and reducing the operational complexity of failure management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements redundant copies of critical electronic modules (e.g., backup TRW module, backup HMI module) that replicate the functionality of primary modules. These copies are identical in hardware architecture and can be programmed with the same control logic, providing straightforward failover capability without requiring complex heterogeneous system management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8935020B2Back-up and redundancy of modules in locomotive distributed control systems
Publication Date: 2015.01.13 PROGRESS RAIL LOCOMOTIVE INC
  • US8935020B2 patent drawing
  • US8935020B2 patent drawing
  • US8935020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a distributed control system for a locomotive. The distributed system may include a network, a plurality of electronic modules and a plurality of control elements distributed within the locomotive. Each of the electronic modules is communicatively coupled to the network in a standardized scalable architecture. Each of the electronic modules may be programmatically reconfigurable to implement distributed control of the locomotive. A first electronic module and a second electronic module of the plurality of electronic modules may be communicatively connected to one of the plurality of control elements via separate communication paths. The first electronic module may be configured to control the control element, and the second electronic module may be configured to control the control element when the first electronic module enters into a failure condition.