Light-Guide Optical Element with Angled Partially-Reflective Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional light-guide optical elements (LOEs) in head-up displays face challenges in achieving uniform image output due to non-uniform reflectivity across partially-reflecting surfaces, particularly at varying angles of incidence, leading to brightness inconsistencies and 'ghost' images.

Innovation Solution

The optical system employs a light-guide optical element with obliquely angled reflector surfaces that have high reflectivity above 60 degrees and partial reflectivity below 35 degrees, allowing for varying reflectivity between successive surfaces to compensate for intensity decreases and prevent ghost images, with reflector surfaces inclined at 20°-26° to the major surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If partially-reflecting surfaces are used to couple out image illumination, then the optical aperture is multiplied, but the reflectivity must be precisely controlled as a function of incident angle which is difficult to achieve in practice

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical aperture multiplicationVSAvoidreflectivity control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different reflectivity characteristics to different regions of the same optical surface. Specifically, the optical surface has a first region with first reflectivity characteristics and a second region with second reflectivity characteristics, allowing each region to be optimized for its specific function without requiring precise angular-dependent control across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The optical surface is divided into multiple discrete regions with different reflectivity properties. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region's reflectivity for its specific incident angle range, simplifying manufacturing compared to achieving continuous angular-dependent reflectivity control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the facet is made transparent (zero reflection) for rays at certain angles, then ghost images are prevented, but this requirement becomes increasingly difficult to fulfill as angles of incidence get larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveghost image eliminationVSAvoidzero reflection requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the optical surface are assigned different reflectivity characteristics appropriate for their specific incident angle ranges. Regions receiving larger incident angles can have higher reflectivity without generating ghosts, while regions receiving smaller angles maintain low reflectivity to prevent ghosting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Illumination intensity

If high transmission (near complete transmission) is achieved at certain angle ranges, then image illumination brightness is maintained, but this conflicts with the need for partial reflection at other angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage illumination brightnessVSAvoidangular reflectivity adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The optical surface is divided into regions with different reflectivity characteristics matched to the incident angle ranges they receive. This allows each region to optimize for its specific angular range, maintaining brightness where needed while enabling partial reflection elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the optical surface into multiple regions with different reflectivity properties, the system can simultaneously achieve high transmission in some regions and partial reflection in others, resolving the conflict between maintaining brightness and enabling angular-dependent reflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures high reflectivity for steeper angles, maintaining image intensity and preventing ghost images, while allowing partial transmission at shallower angles, resulting in a uniform and continuous image output with reduced energy loss.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of the reflector surfaces is configured to have high reflectivity for angles of incidence above 60 degrees to the normal and partial reflectivity for angles of incidence less than 35 degrees to the normal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

employ light-guide optical elements (LOEs) having a pair of parallel major external surfaces to convey a collimated image which propagates within the LOE by internal reflection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInternal reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11526003B2Optical system including light-guide optical element with partially-reflective internal surfaces
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 LUMUS LTD
  • US11526003B2 patent drawing
  • US11526003B2 patent drawing
  • US11526003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical system includes a light-guide optical element (LOE) (100) having a pair of parallel major external surfaces (102, 104) and a set of mutually-parallel reflector surfaces (106a, 106b, 106c) obliquely angled within the LOE. At least one of the reflector surfaces has high reflectivity for angles of incidence above 60 degrees to the normal and partial reflectivity for angles of incidence less than 35 degrees to the normal.