Log Retention Rules for Compliance and Storage Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional log management systems face challenges with inconsistent retention policies, scalability issues, and inefficient storage utilization due to varying regulatory requirements and business needs, leading to compliance risks and unnecessary storage costs.

Innovation Solution

A log retention system that processes logs to determine attributes, applies intelligent, rule-based retention criteria, and modifies these criteria dynamically to adapt to changing regulations and business needs, ensuring efficient storage and compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If logs are retained for extended periods to meet regulatory requirements, then compliance reliability is improved, but storage costs and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidstorage costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts retention periods based on multiple factors including regulatory requirements, log type, severity, and business value. Instead of static retention policies, the system continuously evaluates and modifies retention durations, allowing logs to be kept longer when compliance demands it and shorter when business value diminishes, thereby optimizing storage resource allocation while maintaining compliance reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes retention parameters (time periods, storage locations, access levels) based on varying conditions such as regulatory updates, log categorization, and organizational priorities. By transforming retention from a fixed parameter to a variable one that adapts to different scenarios, the system achieves both compliance adherence and storage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If uniform retention policies are applied to all logs, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to different regulatory requirements and business needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy management simplicityVSAvoidregulatory adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments logs into different categories (by type, severity, source, regulatory domain) and applies customized retention policies to each segment. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simple automated policy management at the macro level while achieving high adaptability at the micro level through category-specific retention rules that can be independently configured and modified

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal retention management framework that handles multiple regulatory requirements and business scenarios through a single platform. This multi-functional system can simultaneously enforce different retention policies across various log types and compliance domains, providing both operational simplicity through centralized management and adaptability through configurable policy templates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive log retention is maintained for all purposes, then audit readiness is improved, but storage efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit readinessVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different retention qualities to different log portions based on their specific characteristics and requirements. Critical logs required for compliance and audit purposes are retained with high quality and accessibility, while less critical logs are retained with reduced quality or in archived formats. This local differentiation ensures audit readiness for necessary logs while optimizing overall storage efficiency by not uniformly retaining all logs at the same quality level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260064630A1Managing retention of logs
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20260064630A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064630A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064630A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches for managing retention of logs are described. In an example, a log pertaining to an operation and/or development of a product and/or service is obtained. The log is processed to determine log attributes and based on the determined log attributes, a retention criteria specifying a retention period for the log is identified. The identified retention criteria is then applied to maintain the log in a repository. In another example, a request to modify a retention period is received. A conflict between existing and proposed retention criteria is determined based on evaluation factors. If no conflict exists, the new retention period is associated with the log.