Hydraulic Log Splitter Stroke Switching With Magnets and Reed Switch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing log processing and firewood splitting machines require inefficient long strokes for both operational and reverse movements of the piston, especially when processing shorter logs, leading to reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A log processing and firewood splitting machine with a hydraulic cylinder and piston rod system that includes permanent magnets and an electromagnetic Reed switch to control the stroke length, allowing for adjustable and optimized operational and reverse strokes based on log length, using a control unit to automatically redirect hydraulic media flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If log processing is done manually with traditional tools, then operational flexibility is maintained, but processing time is excessive and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple log processing operations (cutting, splitting, debarking) into a single integrated machine that performs all functions automatically. The machine merges the functionality of traditional separate tools (axes, saws, debarking instruments) into one automated system with a single operator interface, thereby increasing productivity without requiring multiple separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing machine is designed as a universal device that can perform multiple different operations on logs of varying sizes and types. It includes adjustable cutting mechanisms, variable splitting angles, and adaptable debarking systems that can handle diverse log specifications, making it applicable to various processing needs rather than requiring specialized equipment for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If automated processing machines are used, then processing speed increases, but adaptation to different log specifications is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidadaptation to log specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine incorporates dynamically adjustable components including variable cutting depths, adjustable splitting angles, and movable processing elements that can be repositioned based on log diameter and type. The feed mechanism speed and processing parameters can be dynamically changed during operation to accommodate different log specifications while maintaining continuous automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows modification of processing parameters such as cutting speed, splitting force, debarking intensity, and feed rate according to the specific log characteristics. Operators can adjust these parameters through a control interface to optimize processing for different wood types, diameters, and desired output specifications without redesigning the machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If conventional processing methods are used, then equipment cost is low, but energy consumption is high and environmental impact is negative

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The machine operates continuously through automated feed mechanisms that maintain constant processing without idle periods between logs. The system keeps all processing components engaged in useful work throughout operation, eliminating the start-stop cycles inherent in manual processing and reducing energy waste from repeated acceleration and deceleration of mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical manual operations with an automated control system that uses sensors, actuators, and electronic control to manage processing. This substitution optimizes energy usage through precise control of motor speeds, forces, and timing, reducing energy consumption compared to uncontrolled mechanical systems while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If manual processing is used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but safety risks from manual handling are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine performs hazardous operations automatically without direct human contact with moving parts during processing. The automated feed system, cutting mechanisms, and debarking devices operate independently once logs are loaded, eliminating the need for operators to manually guide logs through dangerous zones. Safety functions are built into the automated system rather than requiring separate protective equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4554764B1Log processing and firewood splitting machine
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 TAJFUN PLANINA PROIZVODNJA STROJEV D O O
  • EP4554764B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4554764B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4554764B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A log processing and firewood splitting machine allows selection among various lengths (L1, L2) of the stroke of the piston rod (21) in a hydraulic cylinder (2) in a direction towards a splitting tool (3) and also in opposite direction, by which a duration of each cycle can often be essentially reduced, and consequently, the overall productivity of the machine can be meaningfully improved. To this aim, on the one hand, at least two permanent magnets (71, 72) are mounted on said piston rod (21), which are in a direction of said longitudinal geometric axis (200) spaced apart from each other and are located on the same side of the piston rod (21) and substantially in a same diametric plane with respect to said longitudinal geometric axis (200), while on the other hand, an electromagnetic Reed switch (8) is mounted on said framework (1) adjacent to the piston rod (21), and is adapted to cooperate with each of said permanent magnets (71, 72) for the purpose of generating a suitable electric signal as soon as anyone of said magnets (71, 72) reaches the area of sensitivity of said Reed switch (8).