Programmable Logic Block Control for Mixed-Slice FPGA Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional programmable logic device (PLD) architectures are not optimized for specific applications, leading to unused resources, larger die size, and inefficient scaling due to homogeneous programmable logic blocks with limited slice types.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a programmable logic device with a dual-slice or multi-slice architecture, where each programmable logic block comprises multiple slices with varying logic, register, and memory functionality, and includes control logic for selecting signals at different levels, optimizing resource utilization and scaling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If homogeneous programmable logic blocks with limited slice types are used, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates and die size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements heterogeneous logic blocks with different slice types (e.g., slices with different numbers of LUTs, different register configurations, different carry logic) within the same programmable logic device. This allows each region to be optimized for specific functions, improving resource utilization efficiency while maintaining manufacturability through standardized fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The logic blocks are segmented into multiple slices, each with configurable characteristics. This segmentation allows fine-grained optimization of resource allocation, enabling better matching of hardware resources to application requirements without increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If homogeneous programmable logic blocks are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different slice types within logic blocks provide specialized functionality for different application requirements. For example, some slices are optimized for arithmetic operations, others for logic functions, and others for memory operations, thereby enhancing adaptability without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The logic blocks incorporate programmable control logic that can dynamically configure the operational mode of each slice type, allowing the device to adapt to different applications through software configuration rather than hardware redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If homogeneous programmable logic blocks are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but scaling efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidscaling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The logic blocks are divided into modular slices that can be independently configured and scaled. This modular segmentation allows efficient scaling of the device by replicating and configuring slices according to application needs, improving scaling efficiency while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized modular units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If larger die size is used to accommodate more resources, then resource capacity is improved, but manufacturing cost and area utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource capacityVSAvoiddie size
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By providing different slice types with specialized functions, the device achieves higher resource capacity within the same die area. Each slice type is optimized for specific operations, reducing the total number of slices needed and thereby reducing die size while maintaining or improving resource capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple slice types are integrated within a single logic block structure, combining different functional units (LUTs, registers, carry logic) in optimized configurations. This merging approach increases resource capacity without proportionally increasing die size by sharing common infrastructure among different slice types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7592834B1Logic block control architectures for programmable logic devices
Publication Date: 2009.09.22 LATTICE SEMICON CORP
  • US7592834B1 patent drawing
  • US7592834B1 patent drawing
  • US7592834B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment of the invention, a programmable logic device comprises configuration memory adapted to store configuration data and a plurality of programmable logic blocks. At least one programmable logic block includes a plurality of dual-slice logic blocks, each dual-slice logic block including first and second slices, each slice including at least two lookup tables (LUTs) and a register. The programmable logic block further includes control logic adapted for selecting control signals separately at a programmable block level, a dual-slice block level, and a register level, the control logic responsive to configuration data stored within the configuration memory.