Logical Channel Prioritization for Synchronization in Wireless Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in ensuring synchronization between different data flows for multi-modal services, leading to potential delays and poor user experiences due to scheduling based solely on logical channel priorities, which may miss transmission deadlines and fail to meet synchronization thresholds.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a processing system in user equipment (UE) and network nodes that receive configuration information indicating synchronization thresholds for logical channels, allowing for data transmission that satisfies these thresholds by prioritizing packets based on both delay and synchronization information, ensuring correlated packets are scheduled accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If packets are scheduled based only on LCH priority, then higher priority LCH packets are transmitted first, but transmission deadlines are missed and synchronization between different data flows is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission deadline meetingVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining synchronization thresholds between different LCHs before scheduling packets. The network node configures and provides synchronization threshold information to the UE, enabling the UE to proactively plan packet transmissions to meet both priority requirements and synchronization requirements, thereby avoiding missed deadlines without complex real-time adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling mechanism becomes dynamic by adapting packet selection based on real-time synchronization threshold evaluations. The UE dynamically adjusts which packets to transmit from which LCHs by evaluating whether transmitting a packet would violate synchronization thresholds with packets from other LCHs, allowing flexible adaptation to maintain both priority ordering and synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If synchronization thresholds are enforced between logical channels, then packet synchronization is improved, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket synchronization precisionVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synchronization control is segmented by applying different synchronization thresholds to different pairs of LCHs. Instead of a monolithic scheduling approach, the system divides the problem into manageable LCH-specific threshold evaluations, where the UE independently evaluates synchronization requirements for each LCH pair, making the complex synchronization task more tractable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by introducing synchronization threshold values as configurable parameters between LCHs. The network node can adjust these threshold parameters based on service requirements, allowing the synchronization precision to be tuned without fundamentally changing the scheduling mechanism complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple data flows with different timing deadlines are scheduled by LCH priority only, then higher priority traffic is served, but synchronization between correlated packets is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidsynchronization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously evaluating whether transmitting a packet from one LCH would violate synchronization thresholds with packets from other LCHs. This feedback mechanism guides the UE's packet selection process, ensuring that productivity is maintained by transmitting packets efficiently while synchronization reliability is preserved through threshold-based decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12068929B1Logical channel prioritization for synchronization
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12068929B1 patent drawing
  • US12068929B1 patent drawing
  • US12068929B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. Some aspects relate generally to logical channel prioritization for synchronization. Some aspects more specifically relate to a user equipment (UE) performing logical channel prioritization based on synchronization information. In some aspects, the synchronization information may include a synchronization threshold between two or more logical channels. For example, the two or more logical channels may be associated with traffic for a multi-modal service or application. A network node may configure the two or more logical channels with respective synchronization thresholds based on the multi-modal service or application.