Logical Graphical Model for Probabilistic Scenario Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current probabilistic graphical model (PGM) authoring tools face challenges such as difficulty in searching and browsing variables by similar attributes, lack of support for documenting evidence, static module organization, restrictive variable identifiers, and limited ability to browse scenarios involving template variables, which hinder effective scenario analysis and model refinement.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a logical graphical model (LGM) to create, edit, and browse assertions and inferences in a probabilistic graphical model, enabling users to identify and compare variables, assert scenarios and factors, attach evidence, and utilize logical inference to reduce redundancy and improve model organization, while separating logical and probabilistic inference processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If probabilistic graphical models are used to represent multiple scenarios and relationships across multiple variables, then the ability to perform comprehensive scenario analysis is improved, but the complexity of model organization and variable management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario analysis capabilityVSAvoidmodel organization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex PGM into distinct components: a logical graphical model layer for organizing variables and relationships, and a probabilistic inference layer for scenario analysis. This segmentation allows independent management of model structure versus probabilistic computations, reducing organizational complexity while maintaining comprehensive scenario analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a logical graphical model as an intermediary layer between the user and the probabilistic graphical model. This intermediary provides structured organization of variables, relationships, and evidence, mediating between simple model creation and complex probabilistic inference, thereby reducing the complexity burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional spreadsheet tools are used for modeling, then ease of operation is maintained, but the ability to represent multiple dimensions and relationships is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accessibilityVSAvoidmulti-dimensional analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a system that combines the ease of spreadsheet operation with the multi-dimensional capabilities of PGMs. The logical graphical model interface provides spreadsheet-like simplicity for defining variables and relationships, while the underlying PGM engine delivers comprehensive multi-dimensional scenario analysis, achieving multi-functionality that satisfies both requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The logical graphical model serves as an intermediary that translates simple spreadsheet-like definitions into complex multi-dimensional PGM structures. Users interact with the familiar spreadsheet interface, while the intermediary automatically handles the complexity of multi-dimensional relationships, enabling both ease of operation and versatile analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If PGM authoring tools are used to define variables and relationships, then scenario analysis capability is improved, but difficulty in searching and browsing variables increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario analysis capabilityVSAvoidvariable search and browse difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension to variable organization by introducing the logical graphical model layer with its structured hierarchy of variables, relationships, and evidence. This additional organizational dimension provides systematic pathways for searching and browsing variables, making them easily locatable despite the complexity of the underlying PGM structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If static module organization is used in PGM tools, then model structure is simplified, but adaptability to different scenario configurations is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structure simplicityVSAvoidscenario configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics to the model organization by allowing the logical graphical model structure to adapt flexibly to different scenario configurations. Variables, relationships, and evidence can be dynamically added, removed, or reconfigured without rigid structural constraints, enabling both simplicity and adaptability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11410060B1System and method for utilizing a logical graphical model for scenario analysis
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 BULLET POINT NETWORK LP
  • US11410060B1 patent drawing
  • US11410060B1 patent drawing
  • US11410060B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for utilizing a logical graphical model for data analysis are described. The system provides a “PGM authoring tool” that enables a user to employ a logical graphical model to create, edit, and browse the assertions and inferences in a probabilistic graphical model.