Logistics Route Optimization via Inventory Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional logistics management in supply chains relies on manual route planning, which is time-consuming, prone to errors, and not dynamically adaptable to changes in demand or inventory status.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for optimizing logistics management by utilizing data such as hierarchical product information, historical path data, and actual inventory data to compute derived inventories, identify discrepancies, and generate feasible path layouts for optimizing shipment routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual route planning is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and reliability deteriorate due to time consumption and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical route planning with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to optimize shipping routes. The system automatically processes inventory data, calculates optimal paths, and generates shipping schedules, eliminating manual intervention and associated errors while significantly improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing inventory levels, calculating optimal routes, and generating shipping plans without requiring manual input. The automated system monitors inventory status and dynamically adjusts routes based on real-time data, making the route planning process independent of human operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual route planning is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to errors and lack of dynamic adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor inventory levels, shipping status, and route effectiveness. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts routes and planning parameters to maintain high accuracy and adapt to changing conditions, ensuring reliable route planning that responds to real-time data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The route planning system is dynamic rather than static, automatically adapting to changing inventory levels, shipping conditions, and demand patterns. The system real-time adjustments based on feedback data, ensuring that routes remain optimal and accurate despite changing operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If automated inventory computation and path analysis is implemented, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogistics management efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex logistics management task into distinct modular components: inventory data collection, inventory computation, path analysis, route optimization, and shipping schedule generation. Each module processes specific data independently and passes results to the next stage, making the overall complex system manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250086576A1Route optimization for product shipment in a supply chain
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20250086576A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086576A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086576A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for logistics management in a supply chain are described. In one aspect, a first data including a first location and a second location associated with a shipment mix to be transported amongst a plurality of facilities located at different locations is obtained. Further, a second data associated with a product amongst the plurality of products is acquired, where the second data includes a hierarchical information and a historical path information of the product. A derived inventory of the plurality of products available within each facility is computed in correspondence with the second data associated with the product. The derived inventory of each facility is compared with an actual inventory of each facility to generate a reconciled output. The reconciled output is analyzed along with the second data acquired to generate feasible path layouts, from which a recommended path is selected for transporting the shipment mix.