Logogram Input via Sub-Logogram Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Entering logograms into input devices is complex due to their numerous strokes and associations with other logograms and phrases, making it difficult for users unfamiliar with all strokes to accurately input them.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that includes an input device, processor, and memory to identify logogram inputs as context logograms or sub-logograms, displaying either a selected logogram or a hint list of candidate logograms to facilitate rapid and accurate entry by users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users enter logograms using traditional stroke-by-stroke methods, then complete logogram input is achieved, but input complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogogram input speedVSAvoidinput method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments a complete logogram into multiple sub-logograms (components or radicals). Users can input logograms by entering these smaller sub-logogram units rather than tracing all strokes, significantly reducing input complexity while maintaining accuracy. The system divides the complex logogram input task into manageable sub-tasks that are easier for users to perform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores logogram data including sub-logogram compositions, stroke sequences, and contextual associations in advance. When a user inputs a sub-logogram, the system has already prepared candidate logogram lists and contextual information, enabling rapid display of relevant options without requiring the user to manually navigate through all possible logograms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If users input complete logograms with all strokes, then accurate logogram entry is achieved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogogram input accuracyVSAvoidlogogram input time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to input only partial information (a subset of complete strokes or just key sub-logograms) rather than requiring all strokes to be entered. The system then uses pattern matching and contextual analysis to identify the intended logogram from candidate lists, achieving accurate input with reduced time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback by displaying candidate logogram lists as users input sub-logograms or stroke sequences. This feedback mechanism allows users to confirm or correct their input by selecting from displayed options, ensuring accuracy while reducing the time needed to complete logogram entry compared to traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system displays all candidate logograms, then complete logogram options are provided, but information overload occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogogram selection flexibilityVSAvoiduser cognitive processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of detail and filtering to different portions of the candidate logogram list based on contextual relevance. Highly probable candidates are displayed with more prominence or additional contextual information, while less likely candidates are filtered or displayed with less detail, optimizing the information presentation to match user needs and reduce cognitive load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-filters and ranks candidate logograms based on contextual analysis, frequency data, and pattern matching before displaying them to the user. This preliminary processing ensures that the most relevant candidates appear first in the display, allowing users to make selections quickly without being overwhelmed by the complete set of possible logograms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If the system requires users to know all strokes and associations, then complete logogram recognition is achieved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogogram recognition accuracyVSAvoidlogogram input ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system breaks down complex logogram recognition into simpler sub-logogram recognition tasks. Users only need to recognize and input familiar sub-logogram components or radicals rather than requiring knowledge of all possible logogram strokes and variations. The system handles the complex pattern matching and recognition of complete logograms from these simpler inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that translates simple user inputs (sub-logograms or partial stroke sequences) into complete logogram identifications. This intermediary system performs the complex pattern matching, contextual analysis, and candidate ranking, shielding users from the complexity of logogram structure and associations while maintaining accurate recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10120457B2Displaying a logogram indication
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US10120457B2 patent drawing
  • US10120457B2 patent drawing
  • US10120457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For displaying a logogram indication, a processor identifies a logogram input received from an input device. The logogram input is selected from the group consisting of a context logogram and a sub-logogram. The processor further displays a logogram indication selected from the group consisting of a selected logogram and a logogram hint list of candidate logograms in response to identifying the logogram input.