Long-Cell Battery Pack Structure Without Cross Beams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery packs in electric vehicles suffer from low space utilization and energy density, leading to reduced capacity, increased weight, and complex assembly processes, which hinder their development.

Innovation Solution

A battery pack design that utilizes long cells with a supporting region connected to a support member, eliminating the need for transverse and longitudinal beams, allowing for improved space utilization and simplified assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If battery modules are fixed on transverse beams and longitudinal beams by screws, then the battery pack structure is stable, but space is wasted and weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidbattery pack weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the transverse beams and longitudinal beams from the battery pack structure, extracting the supporting function to the battery module housing itself. The housing is designed with integrated support features that directly engage with the battery pack casing, eliminating the need for separate beam structures and reducing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the support function into the battery module housing design. The housing incorporates integrated support plates and positioning features that combine the previously separate functions of beams and module housing, creating a unified structure that reduces component count and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If battery modules are fixed on transverse beams and longitudinal beams by screws, then the battery pack structure is stable, but the assembly process becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex beam structure and associated screw-fastening system, extracting only the essential support and positioning functions. This simplifies the assembly process by reducing the number of components and assembly steps required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple functions (support, positioning, and structural integrity) into the integrated housing design, eliminating the need for separate beams and multiple fastening operations, thereby simplifying the assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If end plates and side plates with certain thickness and height are designed for battery modules, then the cell array is properly contained and supported, but space inside the battery pack is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell array containmentVSAvoidbattery pack volume utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thin-walled but structurally optimized housing designs for battery modules. The housing walls are designed with sufficient strength for containment while minimizing thickness to maximize internal space. Integrated support plates provide structural reinforcement without requiring thick walls throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the dimensional parameters of the housing walls and support structures. By carefully selecting wall thickness and support plate dimensions, the design achieves adequate mechanical strength and containment while minimizing the volume occupied by structural elements, thereby maximizing space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a complicated assembly process with multiple procedures is used, then the battery pack can be properly assembled, but labor and material costs increase and defect rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes unnecessary assembly steps and intermediate components (beams, multiple fastening operations), extracting only the essential assembly actions required to achieve proper positioning and structural integrity. This reduces assembly complexity while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple assembly operations into fewer integrated steps. The modular housing design with integrated support features allows for direct installation without intermediate beam attachment steps, reducing the number of procedures and associated costs while maintaining assembly quality through design-driven precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12537254B2Battery pack, vehicle, and energy storage device
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 BYD CO LTD
  • US12537254B2 patent drawing
  • US12537254B2 patent drawing
  • US12537254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery pack, a vehicle, and an energy storage device are provided. The battery pack includes a cell array and a support member, where the cell array includes a plurality of cells, the cell has a first dimension, and the first dimension is a maximum spacing between two imaginary parallel planes sandwiching the cell; and at least one of the cells 600 mm≤first dimension≤2500 mm the at least one cell includes a casing and a core located inside the casing, a supporting region is formed on the casing, and the cell is connected to the support member through the supporting region and is supported by the support member. The support member is connected to the supporting region to support the cell.