Longitudinal Assay Kinetic Analysis for Biomarker Specificity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing detection methods for macro and small molecules, including bio-molecules, often sacrifice sensitivity, speed, or the ability to distinguish specific from non-specific binding, leading to inaccurate biomarker detection and higher false positive rates in clinical and diagnostic settings.

Innovation Solution

A method involving multiple passes of a fluid sample across an assay surface with capture agents, creating binding curves through temporally-spaced detections to differentiate specific from non-specific binding, allowing for accurate quantification of biomarker concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single measure of binding is taken to detect analyte concentration, then the detection is rapid and simple, but the ability to distinguish specific binding from non-specific binding is lost, leading to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidspecificity of binding detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by performing multiple binding measurements at different time points rather than a single measurement. The method involves taking at least two binding measurements at different time points to generate binding curve data, which allows differentiation between specific and non-specific binding through kinetic analysis. This temporal periodicity enables accurate detection while maintaining reasonable throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If the optimal binding time is chosen for one analyte in a multiplexed assay, then that analyte is detected with optimal sensitivity, but other analytes are detected at non-optimal times, sacrificing their detection quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivity for one analyteVSAvoidoptimal detection for multiple analytes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by using kinetic analysis that adapts to different binding rates. Instead of fixing the detection time to optimize for one analyte, the method measures binding over time and analyzes the kinetic profiles of different analytes. This allows each analyte's optimal detection parameters to be determined dynamically from its binding curve, enabling multiplexed detection where each analyte is detected at its optimal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by analyzing binding measurements taken at multiple time points to derive kinetic parameters such as association rates and dissociation rates. By changing the time parameter and analyzing how binding changes over time, the method can distinguish between analytes with different binding kinetics, allowing optimal detection of multiple analytes with different binding characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If non-specific binding is not distinguished from specific binding, then the assay procedure is simple, but the accuracy of biomarker quantification is compromised with higher false positive rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay procedure complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of biomarker detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing multiple binding measurements at different time points before final quantification. This preliminary kinetic data collection allows the system to identify and account for non-specific binding patterns before determining the final analyte concentration. The method establishes baseline binding behavior early in the process, which is then used to correct or adjust final measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using the binding measurements from multiple time points to inform and adjust the interpretation of subsequent measurements. The kinetic data from earlier time points provides feedback about the binding characteristics of the system, allowing the analysis to distinguish specific from non-specific binding and improve the accuracy of final quantification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise identification and quantification of biomarkers by isolating specific binding from non-specific interactions, reducing false positives and improving the accuracy of biomarker detection and diagnosis.

Implementation Method 1

passing a fluid sample containing a labeled analyte across at least one assay surface containing a capture agent for the analyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpecific binding: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

detecting the labeled analyte; repeating the passing and detecting steps at least once; and creating a binding curve for the analyte based on the detecting of the labeled analyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLabel detection: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS10060919B2Longitudinal assay
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 INANOVATE INC
  • US10060919B2 patent drawing
  • US10060919B2 patent drawing
  • US10060919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to macro and small molecule detection and, more particularly, to methods for detecting macro and small molecules, including bio-molecules, in a liquid or gaseous sample.