Longitudinal Gait Analysis System for Runner Biomechanics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing frameworks in biomechanics have not fully modeled variations in biomechanical or physiological relationships within a runner over greater periods of time, such as series of races or running sessions, nor considered the implications of these variations towards health and performance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that obtain sensor data from multiple running sessions, determine values of variables of interest and predictor variables, model statistical relationships, and identify changes in these relationships across sessions, providing personalized analysis of biomechanical and physiological characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional discrete observation methods are used to model runner biomechanics, then the measurement process is simple, but the model cannot capture variations in biomechanical relationships over greater periods of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static discrete observations to dynamic continuous monitoring, collecting biomechanical data throughout entire running sessions to capture temporal variations in gait parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous data collection across multiple running sessions rather than isolated discrete measurements, enabling longitudinal analysis of biomechanical relationship variations over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Loss of information

If comprehensive sensor data collection is implemented across multiple running sessions, then longitudinal analysis capability is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates specific biomechanical relationship parameters from comprehensive sensor data, focusing analysis on key variables such as vertical ground reaction force characteristics and gait parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces statistical modeling as an intermediary layer between raw sensor data and biomechanical insights, using regression analysis to transform complex multi-session data into interpretable relationship patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If statistical modeling is applied to each running session to identify relationships between variables, then performance insight accuracy is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies statistical modeling selectively to identify the most significant biomechanical relationships rather than analyzing all possible variable combinations, reducing computational burden while maintaining insight accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230181057A1Systems and Methods of Longitudinal Analysis of Human Running Gait Metrics
Publication Date: 2023.06.15 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US20230181057A1 patent drawing
  • US20230181057A1 patent drawing
  • US20230181057A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods relate to personalized analysis of physiology and/or biomechanical behaviors of a runner across one, two, three, four or more running sessions. Particularly, the personalized analysis may examine the relationships between variables of interest (VOIs) and their predictors, both within a single running session and across multiple running sessions. These relationship modeling techniques may be used, for example to gain insights into running performance, injury, training adaptation, and/or external effect attribution.