Automated Longitudinal Guidance for Lane-Specific Passing Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver assistance systems for automated longitudinal guidance in vehicles do not adequately address the legal and situational nuances of passing on no-passing lanes, failing to provide comprehensive assistance to drivers in recognizing and navigating exceptional situations where passing is permitted.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system equipped with recognition units for traffic situations, road classes, and special lanes, which allows or prevents passing on adjacent lanes based on predefined criteria, including speed, road type, and lane markings, to ensure compliance with traffic laws and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated longitudinal guidance maintains strict compliance with no-passing lane rules, then traffic law compliance is improved, but driving comfort and flexibility deteriorate in exceptional situations where passing is permitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic law complianceVSAvoiddriving flexibility in exceptional situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the passing prohibition rule based on detected traffic situations. When a column of vehicles is detected on an adjacent lane, the system transitions from a static no-passing mode to a dynamic passing-permitted mode, allowing the automated longitudinal guidance to adapt its behavior to exceptional situations while maintaining compliance with traffic laws

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the traffic environment through sensor inputs and adjusts its passing behavior accordingly. By implementing feedback loops that detect column formations and other exceptional conditions, the system can automatically modify its longitudinal guidance to permit passing when appropriate, resolving the contradiction between strict rule compliance and situational adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If automated longitudinal guidance permits passing on no-passing lanes in exceptional situations, then driving comfort is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional recognition and evaluation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving comfortVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into a unified automated longitudinal guidance framework. The same control unit that manages speed and distance control also evaluates passing conditions and executes passing maneuvers, eliminating the need for separate dedicated passing control systems and reducing overall complexity despite the enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-defines passing criteria and evaluation rules for exceptional situations, including column detection thresholds and passing permission conditions. By establishing these rules in advance, the system avoids complex real-time decision-making algorithms, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high driving comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If automated longitudinal guidance implements comprehensive traffic situation recognition for passing decisions, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic situation recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the traffic situation recognition into distinct evaluation modules: column detection, adjacent lane vehicle detection, and passing condition assessment. Each module processes specific aspects of the traffic environment independently, enabling parallel processing that maintains high measurement precision while reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial evaluation by focusing computational resources on critical passing decision factors rather than analyzing all possible traffic parameters. By selectively processing only the most relevant traffic situation elements for passing decisions, the system achieves sufficient measurement precision without excessive computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11866047B2Driver assistance system and method for automated driving comprising automated longitudinal guidance
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US11866047B2 patent drawing
  • US11866047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver assistance system for a motor vehicle for automated driving includes automated longitudinal guidance, wherein, when automated longitudinal guidance is active in an automatic mode, automated longitudinal guidance is initiated in consideration of a predefinable setpoint speed. The system has a first detection unit, designed to detect a traffic situation in which the vehicle is located on a multi-lane road in a non-passing lane relative to an additional traffic participant detected in an adjacent lane; a second detection unit, designed to detect a defined road class of the road currently being traveled; a third detection unit, designed to detect a defined separate lane of the road currently being traveled; and an evaluation and control unit, which is designed, when automated longitudinal guidance is active, depending on the detected road class and a detected separate travel lane, to allow or to prevent an overtaking of the additional traffic participant detected in the adjacent lane, in the non-passing lane.