Longitudinal Patient Finding View via NLP Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radiologists face inefficiencies in determining the progression of patient findings over time due to the manual and time-consuming process of linking findings across narrative radiology reports, which slows down workflow and hinders accurate quantitative and qualitative assessments of lesion changes.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a natural language processor engine to extract clinical findings, a temporal resolution engine to determine relevant documents, and a visualization interface to correlate and link images with findings, creating a longitudinal view of patient findings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radiologists manually review prior radiology reports to determine finding progression, then clinical context can be established, but workflow efficiency decreases and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical context accuracyVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically extracts and structures measurement data from radiology reports without requiring radiologist intervention. The natural language processing engine autonomously identifies findings, measurements, and temporal relationships, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring manual radiologist review for each comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of radiologists reading and comparing reports is replaced by an automated computational system using natural language processing and information extraction algorithms. This substitution transforms the workflow from human-driven manual review to machine-driven automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If radiologists manually extract measurements and references from narrative reports, then quantitative assessment can be performed, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantitative assessment accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction and structuring of measurement data from radiology reports in advance, organizing it into a machine-readable format with temporal relationships. This preliminary processing makes subsequent quantitative assessments immediate and efficient, eliminating the need for radiologists to manually extract measurements during patient review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate structured data layer is created between the unstructured narrative reports and the quantitative assessment needs. This intermediary representation includes extracted measurements, finding identifiers, and temporal relationships, serving as a bridge that enables efficient quantitative analysis without direct manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If radiologists switch between monitors to access reports and images, then complete information can be obtained, but workflow slows down

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidworkflow speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously separated information sources (radiology reports and imaging data) into a unified integrated view. By combining textual findings, measurements, and image references in a single accessible interface, radiologists no longer need to switch between monitors while maintaining complete information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a multi-functional integrated platform that simultaneously provides access to reports, measurements, images, and comparative analysis. This universal interface consolidates multiple functions that previously required separate systems and monitor switches into a single cohesive tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If qualitative and quantitative assessments are made separately, then detailed analysis can be performed, but consistency between assessments decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment detailVSAvoidassessment consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the assessment process into distinct but integrated components: quantitative measurement extraction, qualitative finding characterization, and temporal progression analysis. Each segment processes specific aspects independently but contributes to a unified assessment, maintaining both detail and consistency through structured integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where quantitative measurements inform qualitative assessments and vice versa. The structured data extraction and analysis provide continuous feedback loops that ensure consistency between numerical measurements and descriptive characterizations, aligning both assessment types with established guidelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10474742B2Automatic creation of a finding centric longitudinal view of patient findings
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US10474742B2 patent drawing
  • US10474742B2 patent drawing
  • US10474742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for creating a longitudinal view of patient findings includes a natural language processing engine which extracts clinical findings from a clinical document. A temporal resolution engine determines which other clinical documents the clinical findings belong to. A visualization graphical user interface indicates the correlation of the clinical findings between the clinical document and the other clinical documents. The natural language processing engine also links one or more images to the clinical findings.