Loop Fastening Material with Optimized Fiber Volumetric Ratio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fastening systems for lightweight, disposable garments like diapers face challenges in achieving cost-effectiveness while maintaining performance and load-carrying capacity, with issues related to fiber content, dimensional stability, and compatibility with substrates.

Innovation Solution

A touch fastener loop material with a specific combination of characteristics, including a Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio (MFVR) between 5 and 25% and a Critical Fiber Volume Percentage (CFVP) below 60%, which enhances engageability, strength, and breathability, achieved through a non-woven web of fibers with tenacious loops and multicomponent fibers bonded by resin.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If fiber content is reduced to lower cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but load-carrying capacity and dimensional stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidload-carrying capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite fiber structures combining different fiber types (e.g., spandex with other fibers) to achieve high strength-to-weight ratios. This allows reduced overall fiber content while maintaining load-carrying capacity through the synergistic properties of the composite material system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates localized regions of high fiber density and bonding strength at critical areas (loop formation zones, bonding points) while maintaining lower fiber content in non-critical areas. This local quality differentiation optimizes strength where needed while reducing overall material usage and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If fiber content is reduced to lower cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but dimensional stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddimensional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary bonding actions during the needling process where fibers are mechanically interlocked and thermally bonded before final product completion. This preliminary stabilization prevents dimensional changes during subsequent handling and use, maintaining stability even with reduced fiber content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in fiber properties (tenacity, melting point, elasticity) and processing conditions (temperature, pressure, needle penetration depth) to achieve optimal dimensional stability. By carefully controlling these parameters, the patent maintains stability with lower fiber content through enhanced individual fiber performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If loop material is made lighter, then weight and cost decrease, but engagement performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloop material weightVSAvoidengagement performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes loop geometry parameters (height, thickness, spacing) and fiber properties (tenacity, diameter) to maximize engagement performance per unit weight. By precisely controlling these parameters, lighter loop materials achieve equal or superior engagement performance through more efficient structural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite fiber structures with high strength-to-weight ratios to create lighter loop materials that maintain engagement performance. The composite nature allows reduced weight while preserving the mechanical properties necessary for reliable hook engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If more fibers are used to improve strength, then load-carrying capacity increases, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-carrying capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent concentrates fiber content and bonding strength in localized critical regions (loop formation zones, bonding points) rather than uniformly distributing fibers throughout the entire material. This local quality approach achieves high load-carrying capacity at critical points while minimizing overall fiber usage and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite fiber structures with high strength-to-weight ratios, allowing reduced overall fiber content while maintaining load-carrying capacity through the superior mechanical properties of the composite material system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Reliability

If loop structures are made more dense, then engagement performance improves, but air permeability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement performanceVSAvoidair permeability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates localized regions of high loop density and bonding in critical engagement zones while maintaining lower density and higher porosity in non-critical areas. This local quality differentiation preserves air permeability in breathable regions while ensuring sufficient engagement performance in functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-efficient, highly engageable, and durable fastening material with improved peel and shear strength, air permeability, and dimensional stability, suitable for disposable applications.

Implementation Method 1

using heat and pressure to locally soften and bond polymer of the fibers directly to the substrate and adjacent fibers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat softening: Melting

Implementation Method 2

using heat and pressure to locally soften and bond polymer of the fibers directly to the substrate and adjacent fibers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure bonding: Compression

Implementation Method 3

a non-woven web of fibers forming both a base and a field of hook-engageable loops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Friction

Implementation Method 4

multicomponent fibers bonded by resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP3302389B1Loop fastening material
Publication Date: 2023.01.04 VELCRO IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • EP3302389B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3302389B1 patent drawingFigure 3~3B
  • EP3302389B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4D

AI summary

A touch fastener loop material has a non-woven web of fibers forming both a base and a field of high-tenacity hook-engageable loops extending outward from one broad side of the base. The fibers are distributed such that the field of loops has a particular fiber volume distribution as a function of elevation above the base.