Loop Seal Reactor for Alternative Fuel Pyrolysis in Cement Plants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cement manufacturing processes using alternative fuels face inefficiencies due to limited residence time in the calciner, leading to incomplete combustion and reduced thermal energy utilization, particularly for fuels with high moisture content or varying properties.

Innovation Solution

A loop seal reactor is used to subject alternative fuels to pyrolysis with preheated/calcined cement meal, providing extended residence time and utilizing gas pulses for optimal mixing and heat transfer, resulting in complete burn-out of charred materials, which are then directed to the calciner for further combustion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If alternative fuels are injected directly into the calciner, then the process is simple, but the residence time is insufficient leading to incomplete combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidresidence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the fuel processing into two separate stages: first in a dedicated reactor where fuel is dried and pyrolyzed with extended residence time, then the charred material is injected into the calciner for combustion. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, solving the residence time limitation in direct calciner injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel undergoes preliminary drying and pyrolysis in the reactor before being injected into the calciner. This preliminary action converts the original fuel into charred material that requires less residence time for complete combustion in the calciner, thereby resolving the residence time contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If alternative fuels with high moisture content are used, then fuel versatility increases, but drying time and energy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel type flexibilityVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor performs preliminary drying of high-moisture alternative fuels before pyrolysis and calciner injection. This preliminary drying action removes the time and energy penalty of moisture evaporation from the main calciner process, allowing versatile fuel use without compromising calciner efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor acts as an intermediary device between fuel storage and the calciner, pre-processing high-moisture fuels by drying and pyrolyzing them. This intermediary step protects the calciner from the time-consuming drying requirement while maintaining fuel versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If longer residence time is provided for complete combustion, then combustion efficiency improves, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion process is segmented into two distinct units: a reactor for drying and pyrolysis with long residence time, and a calciner for rapid combustion. This segmentation allows the long residence time requirement to be isolated to a dedicated unit, achieving high combustion efficiency without making the entire process overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor serves as an intermediary device that handles the time-consuming drying and pyrolysis operations, allowing the calciner to focus on efficient combustion. This intermediary arrangement achieves complete burn-out of charred material while maintaining manageable overall process complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the combustion efficiency of alternative fuels, allowing for the use of low-quality fuels and reducing energy costs by maximizing thermal energy utilization within the cement manufacturing process, while minimizing oxygen interference and optimizing heat transfer.

Implementation Method 1

subject alternative fuels to pyrolysis within a loop seal reactor by utilizing preheated/calcined cement meal as the heat source in the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

contains means to deliver short, intense gas pulses to the alternative fuel/preheated cement meal mixture to facilitate movement of the mixture from the reactor entrance to its exit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pulse fluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

the thus charred alternative fuels that are a by-product of the pyrolysis and the cement raw meal are directed from the reactor to the pyro system of the cement plant, preferably to the calciner, in which the charred alternative fuels are further combusted to provide fuel for the cement manufacturing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10935319B2U-shaped seal and method for use in cement plants
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 FLSMIDTH CEMENT USA INC
  • US10935319B2 patent drawing
  • US10935319B2 patent drawing
  • US10935319B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to thermally convert alternative fuels within a loop seal reactor by utilizing preheated/calcined cement meal as the heat source within which alternative fuels are immersed, subjected to drying, pyrolysis and subsequently charred, and an apparatus utilized to practice such method.