Wellbore Loss Zone Depth Determination via Iterative Pressure Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The exact location of loss zones in subterranean formations during hydrocarbon well operations is unknown, leading to inefficient use of loss circulation materials and increased costs, as current methods cannot accurately determine the depth of fluid loss zones, compromising the integrity of drilling fluids, cement columns, and hydraulic fracturing operations.

Innovation Solution

Real-time logging measurements and hydraulic calculations are used during drilling or cementing operations to determine the depth location of loss zones, allowing for iterative adjustments to minimize wellhead pressure differentials and accurately identify loss zone locations, enabling targeted remedial operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If loss circulation materials are introduced to seal loss zones without knowing the exact location, then fluid loss can be prevented, but material usage becomes inefficient and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid loss preventionVSAvoidloss circulation material efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time pressure monitoring and iterative hydraulic calculations to continuously refine the estimated loss zone depth. By comparing calculated wellhead pressure with actual measurements and adjusting the depth estimate accordingly, the system provides feedback that converges on the precise loss zone location, enabling targeted treatment rather than blanket application of loss circulation materials throughout the entire wellbore

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces physical inspection or trial-and-error methods with a computational system that uses hydraulic calculations and real-time pressure data to determine loss zone location. This substitution of mechanical/experiential approaches with computational analysis enables precise depth determination without requiring extensive material testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If loss circulation materials are applied throughout the entire wellbore length, then loss zones are covered, but operational costs and material expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss zone coverageVSAvoidloss circulation material volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines the specific depth location of loss zones and enables targeted application of loss circulation materials only to the affected zone rather than uniform application throughout the entire wellbore. This localizes the treatment to where it is needed, reducing overall material volume while maintaining effective coverage of loss zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time logging and iterative calculations are performed to locate loss zones, then material placement precision improves, but measurement and calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss zone depth determination accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement and calculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs iterative hydraulic calculations with progressively refined depth estimates, performing more calculations than a single-pass method would require. This excessive computational action ensures convergence to an accurate depth determination by repeatedly comparing calculated and actual pressures and adjusting the depth estimate until the difference is minimized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for precise identification and remediation of loss zones, optimizing the use of materials and reducing operational costs by ensuring accurate placement of loss circulation materials, thereby maintaining the integrity of wellbore fluids and fracturing operations.

Implementation Method 1

introducing a treatment fluid into the wellbore and displacing the treatment fluid up through the annulus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

logging real-time measurements during introducing and displacing the treatment fluid, the real-time measurements selected from the group consisting of actual wellhead pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential measurement: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10119392B2Determining depth of loss zones in subterranean formations
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10119392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of locating a loss zone in a wellbore in a subterranean formation including determining a calculated wellhead pressure, calculating a wellhead pressure differential, calculating a flow rate loss, estimating a loss zone depth, determining a modified calculated wellhead pressure, and calculating a modified wellhead pressure differential until the modified wellhead pressure differential corresponds to a loss zone location in the wellbore.