Lost Motion Valve Actuation with Wedge Locking Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine valve actuation systems face challenges in adjusting valve timing and lift for optimal performance across varying engine conditions, often resulting in increased cost, size, and reduced reliability due to the need for additional components and complex packaging.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a lost motion assembly with locking elements, such as wedges, to selectively lock and unlock valve actuation mechanisms within the valve train, allowing for variable valve timing and lift adjustments through hydraulic actuation, combining with cam phase shifting and variable valve actuation systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If variable valve timing and lift systems are added to adjust valve timing for optimal performance, then engine performance and efficiency are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine performanceVSAvoidvalve actuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the variable valve timing control function with the existing cam phase shifting mechanism by integrating a lost motion assembly into the valve train. This merging approach allows the system to achieve variable valve timing capability without adding a completely separate control system, thereby improving engine performance while limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lost motion assembly is designed to serve multiple functions: it controls valve timing, provides valve lift adjustment, and integrates with the existing cam phase shifting mechanism. This multi-functionality allows a single component to address multiple performance requirements, improving engine efficiency without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional components are added for valve timing adjustment, then valve timing control capability is improved, but space requirements and packaging difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve timing control capabilityVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The lost motion assembly is nested within the existing valve train structure, utilizing available spaces within the rocker arm or valve bridge housing. This nesting approach allows the additional control components to be accommodated within the existing packaging envelope, improving valve timing control capability without significantly increasing space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension within the valve train by employing a plunger-based lost motion mechanism that moves axially within the rocker arm or valve bridge. This dimensional approach allows control components to be arranged vertically rather than horizontally, optimizing space utilization and fitting within existing packaging constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If complex valve actuation systems are implemented, then valve timing precision is improved, but reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve timing precisionVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lost motion assembly utilizes spring-loaded plungers and mechanical locking elements that automatically engage and disengage based on hydraulic pressure changes. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex electronic sensors and actuators, achieving precise valve timing control while maintaining high reliability through passive mechanical operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex electronic control systems with a mechanically-based lost motion assembly that uses hydraulic pressure to control plunger movement. This substitution of mechanical/hydraulic elements for electronic components simplifies the control system, improving reliability while maintaining precise valve timing through direct mechanical linkage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides improved engine performance and efficiency during engine braking operations while maintaining low cost, high reliability, and minimizing space requirements by enabling flexible valve actuation strategies.

Implementation Method 1

The locking elements comprise wedges having at least one wedge inclined surface defined according to a cone frustum and configured to engage an outer recess formed in a housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge: Wedge

Implementation Method 2

allowing for variable valve timing and lift adjustments through hydraulic actuation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP2975230B1Lost motion valve actuation systems with locking elements including wedge locking elements
Publication Date: 2018.02.21 JACOBS VEHICLE SYSTEMS INC
  • EP2975230B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2975230B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2975230B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for actuating one or more engine valves comprises a lost motion assembly including locking elements to selectively lock and unlock a locking mechanism disposed within a valve train such that motions may be likewise selectively applied to, or prevented from being applied to, one or more engine valves. In an embodiment, the locking elements comprise wedges having at least one wedge inclined surface defined according to a cone frustum and configured to engage an outer recess formed in a housing, the outer recess comprising an outer recess inclined surface also defined according to the cone frustum. The device may comprise a locking mechanism disposed within a housing bore in the housing and a snubber also disposed in the housing bore. Furthermore, the outer recess may be configured to permit movement of the locking element along a longitudinal axis of the housing bore.