Manufacturing Lot Scheduling Using Previous Schedule Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large manufacturing scheduling problems involving numerous stations, tasks, and lots are computationally intensive and often impossible to solve directly due to their size, requiring significant time and resources.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a previous schedule to filter and create a smaller, more manageable pool of lots, reducing computational burden by leveraging information from past schedules to generate new schedules efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional scheduling systems attempt to solve large-scale manufacturing scheduling problems directly, then comprehensive scheduling coverage is achieved, but computational time and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of lots scheduledVSAvoidscheduling computation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large set of lots into two distinct groups: a first group of lots scheduled using traditional scheduling systems, and a second group of lots scheduled using a simplified scheduling approach. This segmentation allows the system to handle different subsets of lots differently, reducing overall computational burden while maintaining comprehensive scheduling coverage across all lots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using traditional scheduling methods for only a portion of the lots (the first group) while using a simplified approach for the remaining lots (the second group). This partial application of the computationally intensive traditional method reduces total computation time while still achieving comprehensive scheduling for all lots through the combination of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Quantity of substance

If traditional scheduling systems process all lots comprehensively, then complete scheduling coverage is achieved, but computational resources consumed become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of lots scheduledVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the lot population into two segments: a first group processed by traditional scheduling systems and a second group processed by a simplified scheduling method. This segmentation enables the system to allocate computational resources more efficiently, using intensive traditional scheduling only where necessary while applying lighter computational methods to other lots, thereby reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by applying traditional scheduling computation to only a subset of lots rather than all lots. This selective application reduces total computational resource consumption while maintaining effective scheduling coverage through the complementary simplified scheduling approach applied to the second group of lots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the scheduling problem size increases with more stations and tasks, then manufacturing comprehensiveness is improved, but difficulty in solving the scheduling problem increases rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling problem complexityVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex scheduling problem into two manageable sub-problems: scheduling the first group of lots using traditional methods and scheduling the second group of lots using a simplified approach. This segmentation transforms an intractably complex problem into two smaller, more manageable problems that can be solved with appropriate methods for each subset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies traditional complex scheduling methods partially, only to the first group of lots, while using a simplified scheduling approach for the second group. This partial application reduces the overall complexity burden on the scheduling system while maintaining comprehensive scheduling capability across all lots and stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9671779B2Method and system for filtering lot schedules using a previous schedule
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US9671779B2 patent drawing
  • US9671779B2 patent drawing
  • US9671779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for filtering lot schedules of a manufacturing facility. A first schedule is identified, in which the first schedule is a previously executed schedule. A processing device generates a pool of lots to be scheduled using information from the first schedule, in which the pool of lots is a subset of a plurality of lots associated with the first schedule. The processing device generates a second schedule using the pool of lots.