Lottery Prediction System Using Instable Sets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer systems lack the ability to generate optimized predictions for random events, such as lottery numbers, and do not facilitate collaborative interaction among users, making it difficult for individuals to maximize their chances in a deterministic manner.

Innovation Solution

A distributed computer system with logical modules that allow users to construct and configure 'instable sets' of lottery combinations using various options, providing statistical analysis and collaborative features to enhance prediction accuracy and sharing of strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users rely on completely random selection in lottery, then each draw is independent and unpredictable, but users cannot maximize their chances or control their selections

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepredictability of random eventsVSAvoiduser control over selections

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical lottery data before generating number combinations. By pre-processing past draw results to identify patterns and tendencies, the system creates optimized selection sets that incorporate deterministic elements while maintaining the appearance of random selection, thus allowing users to maximize chances without sacrificing the random nature of the game

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of number selection by introducing weighted probabilities based on historical frequency analysis. Instead of uniform random selection, the system adjusts selection parameters to favor numbers that have appeared less frequently (cold numbers) or follows identified patterns, transforming the selection process from purely random to probabilistically optimized

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If computer systems generate lottery combinations randomly, then all combinations have equal probability, but users cannot systematically optimize their selections

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvenumber of combinations generatedVSAvoidoptimization of winning chances

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the set of all possible lottery combinations into multiple subsets based on different selection strategies (e.g., hot numbers, cold numbers, pattern-based selections). Each subset contains combinations optimized for different approaches, allowing users to select from diversified groups rather than a single random set, thus systematically improving optimization capability while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts combination generation based on real-time analysis of historical data and identified patterns. The optimization parameters are not fixed but adapt continuously as new draw results become available, allowing the system to maintain measurement precision in optimizing winning chances while generating a large number of combinations through automated dynamic adjustment

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If lottery participation is purely individual, then each user makes independent selections, but collaborative strategies and knowledge sharing are not possible

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveindividual decision-makingVSAvoidcollaborative strategies and insights

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual user selections with collectively generated optimized combinations. Users can combine their personal preferred numbers with system-generated recommendations, and the system integrates inputs from multiple users to create syndicate-based combinations that leverage diverse perspectives and knowledge, thus preserving individual ease of operation while eliminating information loss through collaboration

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If the system provides detailed statistical analysis and configuration options, then users can optimize selections systematically, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveaccuracy of predictionVSAvoidsystem structure and operations

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a modular architecture where a single integrated platform performs multiple functions: historical data analysis, pattern recognition, combination generation, user interface management, and result validation. This universal system handles all optimization tasks through unified algorithms and data structures, achieving high measurement precision in predictions while avoiding the complexity that would arise from separate specialized systems for each function

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8727859B2Component for reducing instability in an interactive and participatory system

Publication Date: 2014.05.20 NKOUATCHET WANDJI HUGUES

AI summary

A support system for the prediction of occurrence zones of random phenomena, based on a new model named “instable sets” is disclosed. The calculation or construction of subsets of weak instabilities allows delimiting a small zone, in which random events appear with a high probability. The system implements a process of characterizing instable sets or subsets of lottery combinations so as to enable an approach of efficient and at the same time participatory gaming. In particular, the system supports configuring options of the game by means of a novel process that make the emission of reusable prognosis for multiple users in an interactive mode possible.