Loudspeaker Array SPL Mapping With Wave Physics Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sound reinforcement system design methods, such as the complex directivity point source model (CDPS), fail to account for wave physics aspects like reflection, diffraction, and shadowing/occlusion, limiting design freedom and introducing errors, especially for low-frequency loudspeakers, due to computational complexity and measurement challenges.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using numerical simulations, including Lumped Element Models and Finite/ Boundary Element Methods, to generate a Sound Pressure Level (SPL) map that accounts for wave physics, utilizing pre-stored acoustic velocity data and coarse meshing, enabling efficient computation on modern hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the complex directivity point source model (CDPS) is used to predict sound pressure level, then the phase interactions between sources are captured accurately, but wave physics aspects such as reflection, diffraction, and shadowing/occlusion are not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase interaction accuracyVSAvoidwave physics coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the CDPS model with additional wave physics models (reflection, diffraction, shadowing/occlusion) into a unified prediction framework. This merging allows the system to maintain the accurate phase interaction calculation of CDPS while adding the missing wave physics aspects through integrated computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If full wave domain simulations are run to include reflection, diffraction, and shadowing/occlusion, then wave physics accuracy is improved, but the computational cost becomes prohibitive for end user hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave physics accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the wave physics simulation into separate modular components (reflection model, diffraction model, shadowing/occlusion model) that can be independently calculated and combined. This segmentation reduces the computational complexity of running full wave domain simulations by breaking them into smaller, more manageable calculations that can be performed efficiently on end user hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial wave physics simulations by selectively applying reflection, diffraction, and shadowing/occlusion models only where needed in the acoustic environment, rather than performing complete full-wave simulations everywhere. This partial action approach maintains wave physics accuracy in critical areas while reducing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If direct measurements of bass loudspeakers are conducted to ensure CDPS model accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but the requirement for anechoic chambers limits design freedom and introduces errors for edge cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectivity measurement accuracyVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational models to create virtual copies of the acoustic measurements and directivity patterns, eliminating the need for physical anechoic chamber measurements. This allows designers to accurately model bass loudspeaker behavior through simulation, expanding design freedom to include edge cases and configurations that would be difficult or impossible to measure physically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational characterization of loudspeaker behavior using simplified models and available data, creating pre-calculated directivity patterns and acoustic signatures. This preliminary action eliminates the need for extensive physical measurements later in the design process, allowing for greater adaptability and design freedom while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260037690A1Method of generating a sound pressure level map for loudspeaker arrays
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 FUNKTION ONE RESEARCH LTD
  • US20260037690A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037690A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037690A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of generating a Sound Pressure Level, SPL, map for a venue. The method comprises receiving a loudspeaker system configuration including loudspeaker unit data. A data library is accessed to obtain a loudspeaker unit type data including a geometry of loudspeaker unit types and acoustic velocity information at surface locations of the loudspeaker unit types. A mesh representation of the loudspeaker system is obtained and used to generate system acoustic velocity information at surface locations of the mesh representation of the loudspeaker system. A numerical method is used to calculate surface pressures at surfaces of the mesh representation of the loudspeaker system, based on said system acoustic velocity information. A far field pressure at a multiplicity of observation points within said venue is then obtained and an SPL map generated based on the obtained far field pressures.