Loudspeaker Suspension Element with Localized Stiffness Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Loudspeaker drivers with progressive suspension elements often suffer from non-linear stiffness, leading to distortion and damage during large excursions, especially when the diaphragm geometry includes both curved and straight sections, resulting in uneven force distribution and standing wave resonance issues.

Innovation Solution

A novel suspension element with two opposing straight sections and two opposing curved sections, where the curvature radius of the curved sections is smaller than that of the straight sections, and the mean height of the radial cross-sectional profile of the curved sections is higher, providing a more idealized stiffness profile with linear motion for small displacements and rapidly increasing stiffness for large displacements, while redistributing restoring forces to reduce standing wave resonance patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a progressive suspension element with round shape and uniform cross-sectional profile is used, then the suspension provides fairly constant stiffness for small displacements and rapidly increasing stiffness for large displacements, but the force distribution becomes uneven when the diaphragm has straight sections joined by curves, resulting in non-linear stiffness and distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver protection from damageVSAvoiddistortion from non-linear stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension element applies different cross-sectional profiles to different sections: straight sections have a first cross-sectional profile while curved sections have a second cross-sectional profile. This local differentiation allows the straight sections to provide consistent linear stiffness while the curved sections accommodate the geometric transitions, resolving the non-linear stiffness problem and reducing distortion while maintaining driver protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If the suspension element has a round shape with axial-symmetry, then the force exerted by the suspension element is equal and symmetrical at all locations, but the stiffness profile becomes non-linear when the diaphragm geometry includes straight and curved sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymmetrical force distributionVSAvoidlinearity of diaphragm motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension element differentiates between straight and curved sections by assigning different cross-sectional profiles to each. Straight sections use a profile optimized for linear motion and symmetrical force distribution, while curved sections use a profile that accommodates geometric transitions. This local optimization maintains overall stability while achieving precise linear motion characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the suspension element uses a stadium shape with closed profile straight sections and open profile curved sections, then the geometry accommodates the diaphragm shape, but the stiffness profile becomes very non-linear and the progressive suspension fails to function properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometry matching diaphragm shapeVSAvoidprogressive suspension functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension element maintains the stadium shape to accommodate the diaphragm geometry, but applies different cross-sectional profiles to different sections. Straight sections have a first cross-sectional profile that ensures proper progressive suspension characteristics, while curved sections have a second profile that accommodates the geometric transitions. This local differentiation preserves both geometric adaptability and progressive suspension functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces distortion for small displacements, provides proper driver protection, and increases the linear excursion range, while also raising the upper frequency limit for sound reproduction by minimizing standing wave patterns, resulting in improved sound quality and reduced coloration.

Implementation Method 1

a suspension element surrounding the diaphragm and elastically coupling it to the chassis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a vibrating diaphragm, which is driven axially by means of electromagnetic induction forces generated by alternating current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3008917B1Suspension element for suspending the diaphragm of a loudspeaker driver to the chassis thereof as well as driver and loudspeaker comprising the same
Publication Date: 2021.12.22 GENELEC OY
  • EP3008917B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3008917B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3008917B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention providesa loudspeaker driver not suffering from high levels of distortion caused by the non-linear stiffness commonly found with drivers that utilize progressive suspension elements. The novel suspension element (100) for suspending the diaphragm (300) of a loudspeaker driver to the chassis (400) thereof has a geometry with two opposing first sections (130) and two opposing second sections (110), which connect the two first sections (130). The second sections 1 have a curvature radius smaller than that of the first sections 10 30. The mean height of the radial cross-sectional profile of the second section (110) is higher than the height of the cross- sectional profile of the first sections (130). The first sections (130) have an axial stiffness greater than the second sections (110).