Louver Perforation Sizing for Pipe Strength and Sediment Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming perforations in pipes, such as water well casings, often compromise the pipe's strength and shape, as they either diminish the material or cause deformation, failing to effectively allow fluid flow while preventing sediment and debris entry.

Innovation Solution

A louver perforation system comprising a mandrel, extendible perforator heads, and reaction shoes that penetrate the pipe from the inside while stabilizing it with arcuate reaction faces and centering roller arms, allowing for precise formation of louvers without material removal, thus maintaining pipe integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional perforation methods are used to form holes in pipes, then fluid flow is permitted, but the pipe strength is diminished and deformation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe strengthVSAvoidperforation formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of removing material to create perforations, the invention inverts the approach by forming perforations through material displacement and plastic deformation. The louver blade penetrates the pipe wall and bends the material to create the opening, rather than cutting or drilling away the material, thus maintaining pipe strength while achieving perforation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state and properties of the pipe material during perforation formation. By applying controlled plastic deformation through the louver blade mechanism, the material transitions from its original state to a deformed state that creates the perforation while retaining structural integrity. The process parameters include blade geometry, penetration depth, and bending force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If material is removed to form perforations, then fluid flow is enabled, but pipe integrity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe integrityVSAvoidfluid flow capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the conventional approach by not removing material but instead displacing and reshaping it. The louver blade pushes the pipe material aside and bends it to form the perforation opening, maintaining the continuous material structure and thus preserving pipe integrity while enabling fluid flow through the created opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure at the perforation site where the original pipe material is combined with the formed louver blade structure. This composite configuration maintains the structural properties of the pipe while creating the necessary flow pathway, effectively combining the strengths of both the original material and the formed geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If existing perforation methods are used, then perforations are formed, but sediment and debris passage cannot be effectively prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesediment resistanceVSAvoidperforation shape control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by creating a specific louver-shaped geometry at each perforation location. The bent material forms a blade-like structure that acts as a filter, allowing fluid to pass through while blocking sediment and debris. Each perforation has a localized geometric feature (the louver blade) that provides the filtering function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The louver blade formation involves curving and bending the pipe material into a specific geometric shape. The curved blade structure creates a flow path that allows water to pass while physically blocking larger particles. The curvature of the bent material is essential to the filtering capability, creating a natural barrier against sediment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Shape

If conventional perforation processes are used, then holes are created, but pipe deformation and shape loss occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe shape retentionVSAvoidperforation creation
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using cutting or drilling tools that remove material and can cause deformation, the invention uses a forming process that displaces material. The louver blade pushes and bends the material to create the perforation, maintaining the overall pipe shape while creating the opening through controlled local deformation rather than material removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The pipe is preliminarily supported and positioned before the perforation formation process. The mandrel and reaction table are prepared in advance to provide stable support during the louver blade penetration and bending operation, preventing unwanted deformation and ensuring the pipe maintains its shape throughout the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11992965B1System, apparatus, and method for louver perforation sizing
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 ROSCOE MOSS MFG CO
  • US11992965B1 patent drawing
  • US11992965B1 patent drawing
  • US11992965B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and devices for perforating louver perforations into a pipe are contemplated. Systems, methods, and devices for transporting pipes for perforation are contemplated. Systems, methods, and devices for performing quality control inspections of such perforations contemplated. A pipe may be oriented vertically and raised over a device that punches perforations into the pipe from the inside of the pipe toward the outside of the pipe. Various supports may contact the pipe for stabilization and to facilitate the formation of perforations without removing cut away pieces from the pipe. Electronic monitoring of the features of the pipe facilitate quality control inspection during processing. In this manner, a structurally robust pipe having a series of louver perforations along the pipe may be formed.