Low-Cavitation Impeller with Segmented Blades for Centrifugal Pumps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centrifugal pumps face challenges with cavitation, leading to damage due to localized flow separation and backflow, which conventional designs fail to effectively prevent or eliminate, especially at the impeller eye and along the flow path.

Innovation Solution

The impeller design combines axial and radial flow sections with continuous main blades, secondary blades that split the flow channels, and radial cutouts, along with balance holes to ensure a smooth transition and reduce axial loads, preventing recirculation and backflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional impeller designs are used, then the pump can operate, but cavitation occurs leading to localized flow separation and backflow that causes damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavitation resistanceVSAvoidflow separation and backflow damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller is divided into multiple blade sections (main blades and secondary blades) that segment the flow channels. This segmentation prevents large-scale flow separation and backflow by breaking the continuous flow path into smaller, controlled sections, thereby reducing cavitation damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different blade geometries and configurations to different regions of the impeller. Main blades have specific angles and shapes optimized for their location, while secondary blades provide additional flow control. This local optimization ensures that each region of the impeller is designed to minimize cavitation in its specific operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the impeller design is modified to reduce cavitation, then cavitation resistance improves, but the device complexity increases with additional blades and cutouts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavitation resistanceVSAvoidimpeller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

While segmentation into main and secondary blades does increase structural complexity, it directly addresses the cavitation problem by preventing flow separation. The complexity is justified as it enables the impeller to handle higher flow rates without cavitation damage, improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary blades serve multiple functions: they further segment the flow channels to prevent cavitation, they help control axial thrust, and they optimize the flow distribution. This multi-functionality justifies the additional structural elements by providing multiple benefits from a single design feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If continuous main blades are used, then flow continuity is improved, but axial loads increase requiring balance holes and cutouts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow continuityVSAvoidaxial load
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous main blades are complemented by secondary blades that segment the flow paths. This segmentation allows the continuous blades to maintain flow continuity while the secondary blades help distribute and reduce axial loads by creating additional flow control points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Radial cutouts are extracted from the impeller structure at strategic locations to reduce axial thrust. These cutouts remove material that would otherwise contribute to axial loading, while balance holes are added to equalize pressures. This extraction and addition of features directly addresses the axial load problem created by continuous blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces or eliminates cavitation along the entire flow path and operating envelope, allowing for increased flow rates without damage, and can be retrofitted into existing pumps to maintain efficiency and prevent impeller damage.

Implementation Method 1

centrifugal pump impeller... comprises an inducer end and an outlet end... main blades that extend from the leading edge at the inducer end to the trailing edge at the outlet end... each main blade comprises a section that extends radially, perpendicular to the axis of rotation... a transition section, and a section that is helical or spiral

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

each outlet channel comprises a balance hole in its floor... reduce axial loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 3

secondary blades that split the flow channels... radial cutouts... preventing recirculation and backflow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation control: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentEP3356682B1Low-cavitation impeller and pump
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 SUNDYNE LLC
  • EP3356682B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3356682B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3356682B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A low-cavitation impeller for a centrifugal pump is provided. The impeller provides a smooth flow path from the inducer section through to the outlet section. Continuous main blades run from a leading edge at the inlet eye to a trailing edge at the impeller outlet, and continuous secondary blades run from a leading edge in the transition region to a trailing edge at the impeller outlet.