Low Density Chewing Gum via Supercritical CO2 Aeration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional chewing gums have high density, leading to high calorie content and increased manufacturing costs, with previous attempts to reduce density resulting in unsatisfactory aerated products or unattractive texture changes.

Innovation Solution

Aerated chewing gum is produced by injecting supercritical fluid carbon dioxide into a mixing apparatus, expanding the gum composition, and rapidly cooling it, resulting in a low-density product with a polymer content of at least 50% and reduced bulking agents, while maintaining a similar cud size to traditional gum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional high density chewing gum is used, then manufacturing process is simple, but calorie content is high and manufacturing cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidcalorie content
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of carbon dioxide from gaseous to supercritical phase, enabling it to be injected into the gum base under pressure and then rapidly expand upon pressure release, creating aerated gum with lower density and calorie content while maintaining manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses supercritical fluid injection technology, a pneumatic/hydraulic process, to introduce carbon dioxide into the gum base under controlled pressure conditions, allowing for precise control of aeration and density without complex additional equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Loss of energy

If vacuum or gas injection is applied during or after gum mixing to reduce density, then calorie content decreases, but product quality becomes unsatisfactory with small sized cud

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalorie contentVSAvoidcud size uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates the aeration process during the gum mixing stage itself, rather than as a separate post-processing step. The supercritical CO2 is injected and distributed uniformly throughout the gum base before extrusion, ensuring consistent cud formation during chewing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the phase transition of carbon dioxide from supercritical state to gaseous state upon pressure release. This controlled phase transition creates uniform bubbles throughout the gum matrix, resulting in consistent cud size and texture after chewing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Loss of energy

If aeration step is added to reduce density, then calorie content decreases, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalorie contentVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the aeration process with the existing gum mixing and extrusion operations. The supercritical CO2 injection is integrated into the mixing apparatus, and the expansion occurs during extrusion, eliminating the need for separate aeration equipment and process steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of energy

If sugar or sugar alcohol bulking agent is reduced or eliminated to lower calorie content, then calorie content decreases, but piece size and chewing texture become unattractive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalorie contentVSAvoidpiece size and texture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical structure of the gum by introducing controlled air pockets through supercritical CO2 aeration. This creates a lighter, aerated matrix that maintains adequate piece size and chewable texture without relying on high quantities of caloric bulking agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a low-density chewing gum with reduced calorie content and lower manufacturing costs, maintaining the desired cud size and texture, while stabilizing the aerated structure to prevent collapse.

Implementation Method 1

injecting supercritical fluid carbon dioxide into a mixing apparatus, such as for example, an extruder, while compounding the chewing gum product. The gum then expands upon exiting the apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupercritical fluid expansion: Supercritical Fluid

Implementation Method 2

The gum then expands upon exiting the apparatus (e.g., extruder) and rapidly cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid cooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP2790524B1Low density chewing gum and method of making same
Publication Date: 2018.09.05 WM WRIGLEY JR CO
  • EP2790524B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2790524B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2790524B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Low density chewing gums having a density of less than 0.60 g/cc comprise at least 50% polymer and less than 40% bulking agent and filler combined. The low density chewing gum may be produced by mixing the ingredients with supercritical fluid carbon dioxide and cooling the mixture. The mixture may optionally be cut into pieces and coated.