Low Density Coring Material for Lightweight Composite Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite materials, such as fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP), are heavy and require significant resin usage, making them costly and difficult to use in all laminate structures, especially in small radius areas, and do not provide sufficient weight reduction.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight polymer-based coring material with a composition of 40-80 wt% resin, 0-50 wt% monomer, 0-5 wt% dispersion aid, 0-5 wt% accelerator, 3-7 wt% microspheres, and 1-5 wt% catalyst, which can be used to replace higher density materials, reducing the overall density of composites by 10-50% while maintaining or improving physical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional FRP materials are used, then structural strength is achieved, but weight and resin consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcomposite weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes foam core materials with controlled porosity to reduce weight while maintaining structural strength. The foam structure provides sufficient mechanical properties through its cellular architecture, achieving weight reduction without sacrificing load-bearing capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite construction combining foam core with FRP skins to create a sandwich structure. This composite approach leverages the high strength-to-weight ratio of the foam material while using thin FRP layers for surface strength and environmental resistance, reducing overall weight compared to solid FRP

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Weight of moving object

If alternative lightweight materials like balsa or COREMAT are used, then weight reduction is achieved, but resin demand and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposite weightVSAvoidresin consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the resin formulation parameters by incorporating foam materials that require significantly less resin for saturation compared to traditional solid core materials. The foam structure's high surface area to volume ratio allows efficient resin distribution with lower overall consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If hand laying alternative materials is attempted, then material application is possible, but difficulty increases in small radius areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial applicationVSAvoidhand laying in small radius areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes spray application methodology, which is particularly effective for foam materials. The spray process allows the material to be atomized and applied evenly in complex geometries and small radius areas that would be difficult to reach with hand laying techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Strength

If higher density materials are used, then structural properties are maintained, but weight reduction opportunity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical propertiesVSAvoidcomposite weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs foam core materials with optimized cell structures that provide sufficient mechanical properties for the application. The porous foam structure delivers adequate strength and stiffness while achieving significant weight reduction compared to solid high-density materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The lightweight coring material allows for reduced cycle time and construction in open molding laminate structures, providing high flexural strength and improved productivity, with the ability to be sprayed or applied by hand, and can achieve densities as low as 2.8-3.5 lbs/gal, comparable to or exceeding standard polyester FRP.

Implementation Method 1

a polymer based coring material... about 40 to about 80 wt % resin; 0 to about 50 wt % monomer; about 1 to about 5 wt % catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

about 3 to about 7 wt % microspheres; wherein a density of the cured coring material is less than about 5.0 lbs/gal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS10214618B2Low density coring material
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US10214618B2 patent drawing
  • US10214618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A low density coring material is described. In one embodiment, the low density coring material consists essentially of: about 40 to about 80 wt % resin; 0 to about 50 wt % monomer; 0 to about 5 wt % dispersion aid; 0 to about 5 wt % accelerator; about 3 to about 7 wt % microspheres; and about 1 to about 5 wt % catalyst; wherein a density of the cured coring material is less than about 5.0 lbs/gal. Composites made using the low density coring material and methods of making composites are also described.