Low Density Reactive Surfaces for Selective Molecular Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in creating surfaces with a controlled density of reactive groups, which is essential for selective molecular binding and preventing unwanted interactions, particularly in applications like DNA array technology and microfluidics, where maximizing or minimizing reactive groups is not sufficient.

Innovation Solution

The development of substrates with a selected low density of reactive groups, achieved through the use of surface modifying agents and specific ratios, allowing for the precise control of reactive moieties on the surface to facilitate desired molecular interactions while minimizing unwanted binding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the density of reactive groups on a surface is increased to enhance molecular binding capacity, then the binding capability is improved, but non-specific binding and unwanted interactions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular binding capacityVSAvoidnon-specific binding
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating surfaces with spatially varying densities of reactive groups. Different regions of the surface have different densities optimized for specific functions: some areas have higher density for enhanced binding, while other areas have lower density to minimize non-specific binding. This allows the surface to simultaneously achieve high binding capacity and high specificity by making the reactive group density non-uniform across the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the density of reactive groups is precisely controlled to achieve selective binding, then binding specificity is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactive group density controlVSAvoidsurface modification process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying the density of reactive groups across different surface regions. This is achieved through controlled surface modification processes where parameters such as reagent concentration, exposure time, and environmental conditions are adjusted to produce the desired density distribution. By changing these parameters during the surface modification process, precise control over reactive group density is achieved without requiring overly complex manufacturing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If reactive groups are distributed uniformly across the surface, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but binding selectivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface modification simplicityVSAvoidbinding selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing local quality through controlled non-uniform distribution of reactive groups. While the overall surface modification process remains relatively simple, the key innovation is creating local variations in reactive group density. This is achieved by applying surface modification reagents under controlled conditions that promote non-uniform distribution, such as using reagents with different reactivities or applying them in sequential steps. This allows the surface to maintain ease of manufacture while achieving the binding selectivity required for reliable molecular recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables selective binding of desired molecules while preventing excessive binding of undesired molecules, enhancing the specificity and efficiency of applications such as single molecule analyses and biochemical processes.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the surface to be modified with a surface modifying composition... the first surface modifying agent and second surface modifying agent are present in the surface modifying composition at a ratio that produces the modified surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS8137942B2Method of preparing a modified surface
Publication Date: 2012.03.20 PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA INC
  • US8137942B2 patent drawing
  • US8137942B2 patent drawing
  • US8137942B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Reactive surfaces, substrates and methods of producing and using such substrates and surfaces are provided. The substrates and surfaces provide low density reactive groups preferably on an otherwise non-reactive surface for use in different applications including single molecule analyses.