Low-Density Steel Sheet for Vehicle Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing vehicle weight to lower CO2 emissions, such as thinning steels or alloying with lighter metals, face limitations like reduced rigidity, acoustical issues, and weldability problems, while low-density iron-aluminum alloys with high manganese content have deformation resistance and weldability issues.

Innovation Solution

A cold-rolled and heat-treated steel sheet with a specific composition and microstructure, including 0.10%≤carbon≤0.6%, 4%≤manganese≤20%, 5%≤aluminum≤15%, and a microstructure comprising 10 to 50% austenite with intragranular kappa carbides, regular ferrite, and ordered ferrite of D03 structure, achieving a density ≤7.4, ultimate tensile strength ≥900 MPa, and uniform elongation ≥9%, along with improved formability and weldability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If steel thickness is reduced to decrease vehicle weight, then weight decreases, but mechanical strength and rigidity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle weightVSAvoidmechanical strength and rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (austenite, ferrite, and martensite) within the steel sheet. This multi-phase composite structure enables the material to achieve both high strength and adequate ductility, allowing weight reduction while maintaining mechanical properties. The specific composition ranges (C: 0.15-0.40%, Si: 2.0-4.0%, Mn: 1.5-3.5%, Al: 2.0-5.0%) are optimized to control phase formation and distribution, creating a composite material system that overcomes the limitations of single-phase steels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes precise control of chemical composition parameters and heat treatment parameters to transform the microstructure and properties of the steel. By adjusting compositional parameters within specific ranges and applying controlled cooling rates during heat treatment, the steel achieves a transformed microstructure with enhanced strength and ductility. This parameter optimization allows the steel to maintain mechanical integrity at reduced thicknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Weight of moving object

If steel is alloyed with lighter metals to reduce density, then weight decreases, but weldability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteel weightVSAvoidweldability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the alloying element content within specific parameter ranges to balance density reduction with weldability maintenance. The controlled addition of Si (2.0-4.0%), Mn (1.5-3.5%), and Al (2.0-5.0%) achieves lightening while the carbon content is limited (0.15-0.40%) to prevent excessive hardening that would compromise weldability. This parameter optimization ensures the steel remains manufacturable despite alloying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If high manganese content is added to low-density steel, then strength increases, but deformation resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite microstructure with multiple phases (austenite, ferrite, martensite) where each phase contributes different properties. The austenite phase provides ductility and formability, while the martensite phase provides strength. This phase composite approach allows the steel to achieve high tensile strength (≥900 MPa) while maintaining adequate uniform elongation (≥9%), resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates local variations in microstructure and phase distribution within the steel sheet. By controlling the spatial distribution of different phases and their characteristics, the material exhibits optimized properties in different regions, enabling both high strength and good formability through localized microstructural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If mechanical strength is increased to compensate for thickness reduction, then load-bearing capacity is maintained, but ductility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-phase composite microstructure where austenite provides ductility and martensite provides strength. The synergistic interaction between phases enables the steel to achieve ultimate tensile strength ≥900 MPa while maintaining uniform elongation ≥9%, effectively resolving the strength-ductility trade-off through microstructural composite design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The steel sheet achieves the desired mechanical properties and manufacturing compatibility, ensuring robustness against manufacturing parameter shifts, while maintaining ductility and formability, thus addressing the limitations of existing weight reduction methods.

Implementation Method 1

heating the cold rolled steel sheet up to a soaking temperature between 750 and 950° C. during less than 600 seconds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

cooling the sheet down to room temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

reheating the steel sheet to a soaking temperature of 150° C. to 600° C. during 10 s to 1000 h

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

further cooling the sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 5

cold rolled and heat treated steel sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS12060629B2Method of production of a cold rolled and heat treated steel sheet and use of such steel to produce vehicle parts
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • US12060629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of production of a cold rolled and heat treated steel sheet having the following steps: providing a cold rolled steel sheet with a composition with the following elements, expressed in percent by weight: 0.10%≤carbon≤0.6%; 4%≤manganese≤20%; 5%≤aluminum≤15%; 0≤silicon≤2% aluminium+silicon+nickel≥6.5%; and optionally at least one of certain optional elements; a remainder being composed of iron and unavoidable impurities caused by processing; heating the cold rolled steel sheet up to a soaking temperature between 750 and 950° C. during less than 600 seconds, then cooling the sheet down to room temperature; and reheating the steel sheet to a soaking temperature of 150° C. to 600° C. during 10 s to 1000 h, then further cooling the sheet.