Low-Dimensional FinFET Gate Length Control via Self-Assembled Spacers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor industry faces challenges in achieving high integration density and efficient manufacturing of low-dimensional FinFETs due to limitations in controlling the length of gate structures and contact resistance in existing semiconductor fabrication processes.

Innovation Solution

The formation of low-dimensional FinFETs involves creating a low-dimensional layer for source/drain and channel regions, with self-assembled spacers controlling the gate structure length and source/drain contact formation to reduce resistance, using materials like carbon nanotubes or transition metal dichalcogenides, and patterning techniques to achieve precise dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional fabrication processes are used to form gate structures, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but gate structure length control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate structure length controlVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-aligned spacer formation where the spacer width automatically defines the gate length. The spacer is formed conformally on the source/drain regions, and subsequent etching uses the spacer as a self-aligned mask, eliminating the need for separate lithography alignment steps. This self-service mechanism achieves precise gate length control while simplifying the overall fabrication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary formation of source/drain contacts with controlled dimensions before forming the gate structure. The source/drain contacts are patterned and etched to precise widths that serve as templates for subsequent spacer formation. This preliminary action establishes the geometric constraints that will automatically define the gate length in later self-aligned steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If minimum feature size is reduced to improve integration density, then component integration increases, but manufacturing precision challenges worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidfeature size control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar transistors to three-dimensional FinFET structures with vertical fins extending from the substrate. This dimensional change allows the channel length to be defined by the horizontal footprint while the channel height is provided by the vertical fin dimension, enabling better electrostatic control and improved manufacturing precision at scaled dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The self-aligned spacer formation process inherently controls feature dimensions through the spacer thickness rather than lithographic patterning. The spacer width, controlled by conformal deposition thickness, automatically defines the gate length and source/drain contact spacing, providing manufacturing precision that is less sensitive to lithography resolution limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If source/drain contact dimensions are reduced to improve integration, then integration density increases, but contact resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidcontact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-layer contact structure where lower contacts are formed first, then upper contacts are formed over them, creating a nested vertical contact architecture. This nested structure increases the total contact area and volume without increasing the lateral footprint, thereby reducing contact resistance while maintaining high integration density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite contact structures combining different materials with complementary properties. The contact structure includes multiple material layers that provide both low resistance pathways and good adhesion to semiconductor regions, achieving reduced contact resistance through material composition rather than increased dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for improved electrostatic control, reduced contact resistance, and flexible manufacturing of low-dimensional FinFETs with controlled channel and gate lengths, enhancing performance and integration density.

Implementation Method 1

The length of the gate structure may be controlled in a self-aligned manner by forming temporary self-assembled spacers on the source/drain contacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

a low-dimensional layer used to form source/drain regions and a channel region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow-dimensional material properties:

Data Source

PatentUS11244866B2Low dimensional material device and method
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11244866B2 patent drawing
  • US11244866B2 patent drawing
  • US11244866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a device includes: a dielectric fin on a substrate; a low-dimensional layer on the dielectric fin, the low-dimensional layer including a source/drain region and a channel region; a source/drain contact on the source/drain region; and a gate structure on the channel region adjacent the source/drain contact, the gate structure having a first width at a top of the gate structure, a second width at a middle of the gate structure, and a third width at a bottom of the gate structure, the second width being less than each of the first width and the third width.