Low-Latency RF Signal Classification With CWT and RNNs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RF sensing technologies struggle to adapt to changing conditions and provide efficient, low-latency detection and classification of radio frequency signals in environments with high interference or noise.

Innovation Solution

A combination of continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) is used to process RF signals in real-time, transforming them into a time-resolved frequency representation for enhanced detection and classification, with techniques like model quantization and batch size optimization to achieve sub-millisecond inference latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional RF sensing algorithms are used, then the system is simpler to implement, but the system cannot adapt to changing conditions and has higher latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by training neural networks to continuously learn and adapt to changing RF signal conditions, environments, and signal types. The system transitions from static traditional algorithms to dynamic machine learning models that can adjust to new conditions automatically, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the sensing system by replacing conventional signal processing algorithms with neural network-based approaches. This parameter change enables the system to achieve high adaptability to varying conditions while managing complexity through optimized model architectures and efficient inference techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive signal analysis is performed, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training neural networks offline with comprehensive signal characteristics and patterns. This pre-processing of knowledge allows the system to achieve high detection accuracy during online operation without performing computationally intensive analysis in real-time, thus reducing latency while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical signal processing methods with neural network-based computational approaches. This substitution enables the system to perform comprehensive signal analysis with much lower computational overhead during inference, achieving both high accuracy and low latency by leveraging the pattern recognition capabilities of trained models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If real-time processing is implemented, then latency is reduced, but processing accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference latencyVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the neural network processing into distinct stages: offline training phase where comprehensive learning occurs, and online inference phase where rapid classification is performed. This segmentation allows the system to achieve sub-millisecond latency in real-time operation while maintaining high accuracy through the knowledge acquired during the training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If complex signal environments are handled, then detection capability is improved, but system reliability decreases due to interference and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capability in complex environmentsVSAvoidsystem reliability under interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through the neural network's ability to learn from labeled training data that includes various interference and noise conditions. The system continuously refines its detection capabilities by processing training examples with different environmental conditions, thereby improving reliability in complex signal environments while maintaining high detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250330258A1Low-latency radio frequency signal classification for online RF sensing
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 INFLEQTION QUANTUM LLC
  • US20250330258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330258A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples relate to the field of radio frequency (RF) signal processing such as classifying RF signals with low latency. The method involves receiving portions of an RF signal, transforming these portions into a time-resolved frequency representation using a continuous wavelet transform, and processing this representation with a recurrent neural network. The neural network modifies a neural network state incrementally to generate a classification output, which may include modulation classification, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) classification, or jamming detection. The system achieves sub-millisecond inference latency through techniques such as model quantization and batch size optimization. Principal uses include real-time RF signal analysis and jamming detection, with applications in communication systems and environmental monitoring. The RF signal may be received from a quantum RF sensor based on Rydberg atoms, enabling broad frequency range detection.