Low Melting Polymer Plastisol for Low-Temperature Curing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plastisols require high temperature treatment to fully cure, which is energy-intensive and costly, posing challenges for applications like screen-printing where lower temperature and reduced cure time are necessary while maintaining storage stability.

Innovation Solution

A composition comprising a thermoplastic polymer, a plasticizer, and a low melting polymer with a melting point less than 120°C, which reduces the cure temperature to ≤115°C and measured cure time to <10 seconds, maintaining storage stability and reducing energy input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional plastisols are used, then adhesion and durability are achieved, but high temperature treatment is required which increases energy consumption and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion and durabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the plastisol by incorporating specific low melting point polymers (melting point <120°C) such as polyethylene, polypropylene, or their copolymers in amounts of 5-30 wt%. This parameter change allows the curing process to occur at lower temperatures (≤115°C) while still achieving the required adhesion and durability, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite plastisol system by combining conventional thermoplastic polymers with low melting point polymers and plasticizers. This composite material structure enables the formulation to cure at reduced temperatures while maintaining the adhesion and durability properties of conventional plastisols, effectively resolving the energy consumption contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If conventional plastisols are used, then sufficient adhesion is achieved, but cure time is extended due to high temperature requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadhesionVSAvoidcure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the melting point parameter of the polymer components to include low melting point materials (<120°C), the curing process can proceed at lower temperatures with faster kinetics. The low melting point polymers melt and facilitate curing more rapidly, reducing cure time while maintaining adhesion quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The low melting point polymers perform a preliminary action by melting first at lower temperatures, creating a more favorable environment for subsequent curing reactions. This preliminary melting action accelerates the overall curing process and reduces total cure time while preserving adhesion properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If low melting polymer is added to reduce cure temperature, then energy consumption decreases, but storage stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidstorage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention carefully controls the amount of low melting polymer within specific ranges (5-30 wt%, preferably 10-20 wt%) to optimize the balance between reduced cure temperature and storage stability. This parameter optimization ensures that enough low melting polymer is present to enable low-temperature curing while maintaining adequate storage stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different functional requirements to different components: the low melting point polymer provides low-temperature curing capability, while the plasticizer and thermoplastic polymer maintain storage stability. This local quality differentiation allows the system to achieve both reduced energy consumption and maintained stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If high temperature treatment is applied, then cure completeness is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecure completenessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the composition parameters to include low melting point polymers, the curing temperature parameter can be reduced to ≤115°C while still achieving complete curing. This parameter change directly reduces manufacturing costs by lowering energy requirements without sacrificing cure completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The low melting point polymers act as temporary facilitators that enable low-temperature curing and can be readily incorporated and removed during the curing process. Their use as inexpensive additives that serve their purpose and are then consumed or transformed contributes to cost-effective manufacturing while ensuring complete curing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition achieves reduced energy consumption and lower costs by lowering the cure temperature and time, while maintaining long-term storage stability and adhesion, making it suitable for applications like screen-printing and protective coatings.

Implementation Method 1

a low melting polymer having a melting point less than about 120° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

requires lower temperature or reduced exposure time to full cure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy absorption: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20250019533A1Composition of thermoplastic polymer, plasticizer, and low melting polymer
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 AVIENT CORP
  • US20250019533A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019533A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019533A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A composition includes a thermoplastic polymer, a plasticizer, and about 0.2 wt % to about 19 wt % of a low melting polymer, based on a total weight of the composition. The low melting polymer has a melting point less than about 120° C. The resulting composition requires a lower temperature to full cure, while still maintaining long-term storage stability.