Low-Power Wake-Up Signals for Reduced Main Receiver Usage
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing power consumption and reliability in user equipment (UE) operations, particularly in high-frequency bands like FR2, where low-complexity low power wake-up receivers (LP-WUR) may struggle with decoding control messages associated with beam pair maintenance.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a low power wake-up signal (LP-WUS) that includes control information using an on-off keying (OOK) waveform, enabling the UE to perform operations like MR wake-up, channel state information reporting, beam switching, and synchronization, while reducing MR usage duration.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Use of energy by moving object
If a low-complexity low power wake-up receiver (LP-WUR) is used to receive wake-up signals, then power consumption is reduced, but the ability to decode control messages for beam pair maintenance in high-frequency bands deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The receiver is divided into two distinct components: an LP-WUR designed for low-power wake-up signal reception and a full-featured main receiver (MR) for detailed control message decoding. The LP-WUR handles only the critical wake-up function with minimal power consumption, while the MR processes beam pair maintenance control messages when needed. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between low power consumption and high decoding capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The LP-WUR acts as an intermediary that receives wake-up signals and triggers the MR to activate. This intermediary approach allows the system to maintain low power consumption during wake-up detection while enabling the full-featured MR to handle complex control message decoding only when necessary, thus resolving the contradiction between power savings and decoding reliability.
2Reliability
If the main receiver (MR) is kept on continuously to ensure reliable communication, then communication reliability is improved, but power consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements periodic wake-up cycles where the LP-WUR monitors for wake-up signals at low power intervals. The MR is activated periodically only when wake-up signals are detected, rather than remaining continuously on. This periodic activation pattern ensures communication reliability when needed while significantly reducing overall power consumption during sleep periods.
Solution Approach 2:
The LP-WUR performs preliminary wake-up detection before activating the full-featured MR. This preliminary action filters out unnecessary MR activations by first checking for wake-up signals at low power, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining communication reliability through proper signal-triggered activation.
3Speed
If control information is transmitted without wake-up signals, then signal transmission speed is improved, but power consumption control is worsened
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary wake-up signal transmission before delivering control information. The LP-WUR first transmits the wake-up signal to alert the UE, then the MR activates to transmit the actual control information. This preliminary wake-up action enables the UE to prepare for incoming control messages, improving transmission efficiency while maintaining power control through the wake-up trigger mechanism.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may receive, via a low power wake-up receiver (LP-WUR), a low power wake-up signal (LP-WUS) that may be indicative that the UE is to switch from use of the LP-WUR to a main receiver (MR), where the LP-WUR may be limited with respect to the MR. In some examples, the LP-WUS may also include control information. In some examples, the UE may switch the MR to an on state based on receiving the LP-WUS, via the LP-WUR. The control information may be associated with an MR wake-up indication, channel state information reporting, beam switching, transmission configuration indication activation or deactivation, synchronization signal transmissions, a random access procedure, or a combination thereof. The UE may perform, after switching the MR to the on state, one or more operations associated with the control information indicated in the LP-WUS.


