Low-Pressure Surface Cleaning Apparatus for HVAC Coil Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for cleaning air handler systems, such as HVAC coils and fins, are inefficient and can cause damage due to high pressures and flow rates, leading to increased energy costs, reduced air quality, and potential for airborne pathogens to spread.

Innovation Solution

A cleaning apparatus and system that operates at pressures of 600 PSI or less and flow rates of 1 gallon per minute or less, using chemical cleaning agents, biocides, and biostatics to effectively clean surfaces while minimizing water and solution usage, reducing labor and energy consumption, and extending the life of air handler systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high pressure cleaning (over 600 PSI) is used to clean air handler coils and fins, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but damage to the coils and fins occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoiddamage to coils and fins
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from high (over 600 PSI) to low (600 PSI or less), and combines it with chemical cleaning agents to maintain cleaning effectiveness while preventing mechanical damage to the coils and fins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces chemical cleaning agents as an intermediary substance that works in conjunction with low-pressure water to achieve effective cleaning without the need for high-pressure mechanical force that would cause damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If high flow rate water (exceeding 1 gallon per minute) is used for cleaning, then cleaning coverage is improved, but water consumption and mess increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning coverageVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the flow rate parameter from high (exceeding 1 gallon per minute) to low (1 gallon per minute or less), and compensates by using chemical cleaning agents to ensure adequate cleaning coverage is achieved without excessive water consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical cleaning approach (relying on high-volume water flow) with a chemical-based approach, where cleaning agents do the primary work of loosening and removing contaminants, allowing low-flow water to complete the rinsing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If acid or alkaline cleaners are used to clean heavily fouled air systems, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but corrosion damage to coils and fins occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidcorrosion damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameter of the cleaning agent, selecting neutral pH cleaners instead of acidic or alkaline cleaners, thereby achieving effective cleaning of heavily fouled systems without causing corrosion damage to the metal coils and fins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses neutral cleaners that can be safely applied without concern for long-term corrosion, effectively treating the cleaning process as a maintenance operation rather than a heavy-duty industrial cleaning, which extends the life of the air handler components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If metal fin rakes and brushes are used to remove heavy buildup, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but additional damage to the air system occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidadditional damage to air system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical scraping tools (metal fin rakes and brushes) with a chemical cleaning system that uses neutral cleaners to dissolve and lift heavy buildup, eliminating the need for physical contact that would cause bending, breaking, or other damage to the delicate fins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides faster, more effective cleaning with reduced mess and downtime, improving indoor air quality, extending the life of air handler systems, and minimizing the transmission of airborne pathogens and odors.

Implementation Method 1

a pump and an applicator connected to the pump through which one or more cleaning agents can be applied to the surface at an operating pressure that is about 600 PSI or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS8034189B2Processes for surface cleaning
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 ECOLAB USA INC
  • US8034189B2 patent drawing
  • US8034189B2 patent drawing
  • US8034189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described and claimed are apparatuses and systems for surface cleaning comprising a pump and an applicator connected to the pump through which one or more cleaning agents can be applied to the surface at an operating pressure that is about 600 PSI or less and an operating flow rate that is about 1 gal/min or less.