Low-Pressure Shaft Midshaft Rating for Bending Mode Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbomachine shafts in turbomachinery engines experience excessive vibrations and instability due to excitation of the first-order beam bending mode, particularly in newer engine architectures with faster shaft speeds and reduced stiffness-to-weight ratios, which can lead to operational inefficiencies and reduced power output.

Innovation Solution

The design of turbomachine shafts incorporates varying combinations of material composition, geometry, and bearing support configurations to increase the critical speed of the low-pressure turbine shaft, including the use of ceramic matrix composites and optimized shaft lengths and diameters, while maintaining engine performance and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If shaft speed is increased to improve engine performance, then power output is improved, but vibrations and instability increase due to excitation of the first-order beam bending mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidvibrations and instability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the shaft's physical properties including using ceramic matrix composite materials to change density and stiffness characteristics, adjusting shaft diameter and length dimensions, and selecting bearing support configurations. These parameter modifications shift the critical speed upward, allowing the shaft to operate stably at higher speeds without exciting the first-order beam bending mode, thereby resolving the contradiction between power output and vibration stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials, specifically ceramic matrix composites, to construct the shaft. These composite materials provide a favorable strength-to-weight ratio and stiffness-to-weight ratio, enabling the shaft to maintain structural integrity and avoid resonant vibrations at higher operating speeds, thus allowing increased power output without compromising stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If shaft diameter is increased to reduce vibrations, then stability is improved, but spatial requirements and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidspatial requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the shaft's dimensional parameters by optimizing the diameter and length ratios. Rather than simply increasing diameter, the patent finds an optimal balance where the shaft diameter is sufficient to raise the critical speed above operating speeds while maintaining acceptable spatial constraints within the engine architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the shaft's cross-sectional properties along its length and by strategically positioning bearing supports at specific locations. This creates regions of different stiffness and support characteristics that collectively enhance stability without requiring a uniform increase in shaft diameter throughout, thereby reducing overall spatial requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If bearing support configuration is optimized to increase critical speed, then vibrations are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationsVSAvoidbearing support configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically positioning bearing supports at specific locations along the shaft rather than using a uniform distribution. This optimized placement creates localized support characteristics that effectively raise the critical speed and reduce vibrations while minimizing the number of bearings required, thereby controlling device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the bearing support configuration a variable design parameter that can be optimized for different engine architectures and operating conditions. The same bearing support methodology can be applied across different shaft sizes and engine types, providing a universal solution that reduces vibrations without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260048847A1Midshaft Rating for Turbomachine Engines
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US20260048847A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048847A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048847A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbomachine engine including a high-pressure compressor, a high-pressure turbine, a combustion chamber in flow communication with the high-pressure compressor and the high-pressure turbine, and a power turbine in flow communication with the high-pressure turbine. At least one of the high-pressure compressor, the high-pressure turbine, and the power turbine comprises a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) material. The turbomachine engine includes a low-pressure shaft coupled to the power turbine and characterized by a midshaft rating (MSR) between two hundred (ft/sec)1/2 and three hundred (ft/sec)1/2. The low-pressure shaft has a redline speed between fifty and two hundred fifty feet per second (ft/sec). The turbomachine engine is configured to operate up to the redline speed without passing through a critical speed associated with a first-order bending mode of the low-pressure shaft.