Low Radius Ratio Fan Blade for Gas Turbine Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine engines face challenges in reducing the radius ratio of fan blades to increase thrust while maintaining performance and reducing mass, complexity, and fuel utilization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing fan blades with a shortened dovetail length and a leading edge hub point radially inward of the attachment pressure face, which reduces the axial dovetail length and rotor disk diameter, thereby decreasing the radius ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the radius ratio of fan blades is reduced to increase thrust, then thrust increases, but blade root length decreases which may compromise structural integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidblade root length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the fan blade by reducing the axial dovetail length and repositioning the leading edge hub point radially inward of the attachment pressure face. This parameter modification allows the blade root to be shorter while maintaining structural integrity through optimized stress distribution in the composite material construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fan blade is constructed using composite materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling the blade to maintain structural integrity with a shortened root length. The composite construction allows for tailored fiber orientation and material distribution to handle the reduced blade root geometry while withstanding centrifugal and aerodynamic loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If the axial dovetail length is shortened to reduce radius ratio, then radius ratio decreases and thrust increases, but manufacturing complexity may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fan blade is manufactured as an integral component with the airfoil, axial dovetail, and leading edge hub point formed as a unified structure. This segmentation approach during manufacturing (forming the entire blade root assembly in one piece) reduces assembly complexity despite the unconventional geometry, as the complex shape is created in a single molding or fabrication process rather than assembled from multiple parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of stationary object

If the rotor disk diameter is reduced to decrease radius ratio, then engine weight and complexity reduce, but blade attachment area decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine weightVSAvoidblade attachment area
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the attachment geometry by repositioning the leading edge hub point radially inward of the attachment pressure face and reducing axial dovetail length. This creates a more efficient stress distribution pattern that allows adequate attachment area in a reduced diameter rotor disk, maintaining connection strength despite the smaller overall size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11834964B2Low radius ratio fan blade for a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11834964B2 patent drawing
  • US11834964B2 patent drawing
  • US11834964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture are disclosed to implement a low radius ratio fan blade for a gas turbine engine. A fan blade for a gas turbine engine includes an airfoil including a leading edge and a trailing edge extending between a root and a tip of the airfoil, a distance between the leading edge and the trailing edge defining a flow path length, a leading edge hub point defined by a radially innermost point of the leading edge, and an axial dovetail including a pair of opposed pressure faces, an axial length of the axial dovetail less than the flow path length, a top edge of the axial dovetail separating the pressure faces from the airfoil, the top edge of the axial dovetail radially outward of the leading edge hub point.