Low-Rate Hydraulic Fracturing with Reactive Agents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydraulic fracturing methods are ineffective in creating fractures in carboniferous formations like shales and clays, and often require high injection rates and large volumes of water, leading to equipment damage and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of sequential stages of proppant-carrying treatment fluids interspersed with reactive agents and 'clean' fluids at low injection rates to create varied fracture geometries and enhance conductivity in subterranean formations, allowing for the creation and enhancement of conductive channels without the need for high-pressure pumping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high injection rates and large volumes of water are used in current shale fracturing treatments, then fracture creation in carboniferous formations is achieved, but equipment damage occurs and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture creation effectivenessVSAvoidequipment damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the injection rate parameter from high to low (e.g., 2-10 barrels per minute instead of higher rates), and modifies the treatment fluid composition to include reactive agents that chemically interact with the formation. This allows effective fracture creation in carboniferous formations without the harmful high injection rates that cause equipment damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical hydraulic fracturing with a combination of chemical reaction and low-pressure fluid injection. Reactive agents in the treatment fluid chemically interact with carboniferous formations to create fractures, substituting the need for high mechanical injection forces that damage equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If conventional fracturing methods are used in carboniferous formations, then treatment is applied, but effective fracture network creation is not achieved due to finely laminated structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture network creationVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical fracturing with chemical reaction-based fracture creation. Reactive agents chemically interact with carboniferous formations (shales, clays, coal beds) to create effective fracture networks, overcoming the limitation of finely laminated structures that prevent conventional mechanical fracturing from working effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the treatment approach from high-pressure mechanical injection to low-pressure chemical reaction. Treatment fluids containing reactive agents are injected at low rates, allowing chemical interactions to create fractures in formations with finely laminated structures where conventional methods fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If sequential stages of proppant-carrying treatment fluids are introduced at low injection rates, then complex fracture networks are created with reduced equipment stress, but treatment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment stressVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the fracturing treatment into sequential stages, with each stage introducing treatment fluid to a specific depth interval or fracture zone. This segmentation allows low injection rates to be used effectively while creating comprehensive fracture networks across multiple zones, reducing equipment stress compared to single-stage high-rate treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic injection of treatment fluids in sequential stages rather than continuous high-rate injection. Each stage is followed by a transition to the next stage, creating a periodic treatment pattern that reduces equipment stress while achieving extensive fracture network creation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of more complex and extensive fracture networks at lower injection rates, reducing equipment stress and costs while maintaining conductivity, even in challenging formations like shales and clays.

Implementation Method 1

the series of treatment fluids react with the formation to etch or widen channels extending from the one or more fractures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction (etching):

Implementation Method 2

In one or more embodiments, the plurality of microproppant particles comprises a reactive agent capable of dissolving or reacting with minerals in the formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution:

Data Source

PatentUS11236599B2Methods of low-rate hydraulic fracturing treatments
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US11236599B2 patent drawing
  • US11236599B2 patent drawing
  • US11236599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method comprising of determining an injection flow rate for each one of a plurality of wells, determining a total injection flow rate for the plurality of wells, introducing sequentially a series of treatment fluids into a well bore of each one of the plurality of wells, wherein each of the well bores penetrates at least a portion of a subterranean formation, the series of treatment fluids comprising: a first treatment fluid that comprises a base fluid and a reactive agent; and a second treatment fluid that comprises a microproppant slurry, allowing the first treatment fluid to form one or more fractures in the subterranean formation, and depositing at least a portion of a microproppant in the microproppant slurry in at least a portion of the one or more fractures in the subterranean formation.