Low Surface Energy Static Internals for Liquid-Liquid Contactor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agitated liquid-liquid contactors face inefficiencies due to droplets sticking to internal components, leading to reduced mass transfer and increased complexity and cost, as they require calming sections and complex agitation systems to prevent droplet coalescence and wetting issues.

Innovation Solution

An agitated liquid-liquid contactor design with static internals having low surface energy (<40 mN/m) made of non-wetting materials like plastics, eliminating calming sections and using only active zones to prevent droplet wetting and coalescence, enhancing interfacial area and separation performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metallic internals are used in the contactor, then structural strength and durability are improved, but droplets stick to the internals causing reduced mass transfer and increased hold up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmass transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface energy parameter of the internals from high (metallic) to low (plastic coating or fluorinated material), transforming the wetting characteristics to prevent droplet adhesion while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction by coating metallic internals with plastic materials or fluorinated substances, combining the structural strength of metal with the non-wetting properties of the coating layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If calming sections are added to prevent droplet coalescence, then separation performance is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation performanceVSAvoidcontactor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the calming sections entirely from the contactor design, relying instead on the non-wetting internals to prevent droplet coalescence and maintain dispersion throughout the contactor length

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-wetting internals automatically prevent droplet adhesion and promote continuous dispersion without requiring additional calming sections or complex control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If agitation intensity is increased to improve droplet dispersion, then interfacial area is improved, but droplet coalescence on internals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterfacial areaVSAvoiddroplet coalescence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface energy parameter of the internals to low values, preventing droplet coalescence even under high agitation conditions by eliminating the wetting mechanism that causes adhesion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves mass transfer efficiency, reduces operational complexity, and minimizes costs by preventing droplet coalescence and wetting, allowing for finer droplet dispersion and higher throughput without the need for calming sections.

Implementation Method 1

the surface energy of the static internal is less than 40 mN/m, preferably less than 30 mN/m, more preferably less than 20 mN/m

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface energy: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 2

static internals having low surface energy (<40 mN/m) made of non-wetting materials like plastics, eliminating calming sections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-wetting: Wetting

Implementation Method 3

Through agitator systems, the droplets of a first liquid are formed and remain dispersed in a second liquid for longer periods of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical agitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 4

Sufficient interfacial area for liquid-liquid contact is necessary for the primary function of heat and/ or mass transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass transfer: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP3057675B1Agitated liquid-liquid contactor and use of an agitated liquid-liquid contactor
Publication Date: 2022.03.09 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • EP3057675B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3057675B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3057675B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A static internal (1) embodied so as to be suitable for improving a contact, heat transfer or mass transfer between the liquids in an agitated liquid-liquid contactor (3) lacking calming sections and having an metallic agitated internal (2). The surface energy of the static internal (1) is &lt; 40, preferably &lt; 30, more preferably &lt; 25, most preferably &lt; 20 mN/m.