Lower Gate Stopper Structure for Lateral Collision Incursion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tailgate structures lack effective mechanisms to minimize passenger injury and vehicle damage during lateral collisions and to support passenger entry/exit without interference.

Innovation Solution

A lower gate stopper structure with a protruding stopper unit controlled by a controller, which selectively extends based on the gate's open or closed state, incorporating a stopper gear, rack unit, and drive unit to absorb impact during collisions and prevent incursion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a lateral side structure is constructed to minimize deformation of the vehicle body, then passenger safety is improved, but the structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate support structure is divided into multiple segments including the gate assembly, gate stopper assembly, and gate hinge assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for safety while maintaining overall structural integrity, reducing the complexity of the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gate stopper protrudes in advance when the gate is in the closed position to prevent incursion during lateral collisions. This preliminary protective action enhances passenger safety without requiring complex active control systems, as the protection is automatically positioned before collision occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a gate stopper structure is added to absorb impact during lateral collision, then passenger safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate stopper is designed to convert the harmful impact force during lateral collision into a beneficial protective function. By protruding to contact the gate and prevent incursion, the structure transforms collision energy into a safety mechanism, enhancing passenger protection without requiring complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate stopper assembly automatically positions itself based on the gate position. When the gate is closed, the stopper protrudes to provide protection; when the gate opens, the stopper retracts. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex sensors and control systems while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If a stopper unit protrudes when the gate is closed to prevent incursion, then passenger safety is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidease of gate operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gate stopper assembly is designed with dynamic movement capability, allowing the stopper to protrude and retract based on gate position. This dynamic adjustment ensures the stopper provides protection when needed (gate closed) while automatically clearing the path when the gate opens, maintaining ease of operation without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows safe passenger entry/exit without interference and efficiently absorbs collision energy when the gate is closed, enhancing passenger safety and minimizing vehicle damage.

Implementation Method 1

a rack unit, which is connected to the stopper unit and which is moved longitudinally so as to cause the stopper unit to protrude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical transmission: Rack and Pinion

Implementation Method 2

a stopper unit adapted to protrude from an upper end of a groove positioned adjacent to an inner surface of a gate... capable of absorbing an impact in the event of a lateral collision of a vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact absorption: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

the stopper unit may include a stopper gear engaged with the rack unit, and at least one stopper adapted to be rotated about the stopper gear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear rotation: Gear

Data Source

PatentUS11761252B2Lower gate stopper structure
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11761252B2 patent drawing
  • US11761252B2 patent drawing
  • US11761252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment lower gate stopper structure includes a stopper unit configured to protrude from an upper end of a groove positioned adjacent to an inner surface of a gate, a rack unit connected to the stopper unit and configured to move longitudinally to cause the stopper unit to protrude, and a controller configured to selectively control protrusion of the stopper unit based on an open or closed state of the gate.