LOX Inhibitor Compounds Selective Enzyme Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current LOX inhibitors are either non-selective, lack potency, or are unsuitable for clinical use, with only limited compounds having progressed to clinical trials, and none have been used clinically since 1978, highlighting a need for new and effective LOX inhibitors.

Innovation Solution

Development of specific compounds of formula I, or their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, which are designed to inhibit lysyl oxidase (LOX) and lysyl oxidase-like (LOXL) enzymes, targeting conditions such as cancer, fibrotic diseases, and cardiovascular conditions, with a focus on selectivity and improved potency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing LOX inhibitors are used, then LOX activity is inhibited, but selectivity is poor and potency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitor effectivenessVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing inhibitors with specific molecular structures (formula I) that target particular regions of the LOX enzyme active site. The compounds feature specific substituent patterns on the core structure that selectively interact with conserved residues in the catalytic domain, achieving high selectivity for LOX over other enzymes while maintaining potent inhibition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying molecular parameters of the inhibitor structure, including substituent types, positions, and steric properties. This structural optimization allows fine-tuning of binding affinity and selectivity, transforming early-generation non-selective inhibitors into highly specific compounds with improved therapeutic potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If existing LOX inhibitors are used, then LOX activity is inhibited, but clinical suitability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitor effectivenessVSAvoidclinical suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by developing a series of compounds with optimized pharmacological properties that replace outdated inhibitors. The new compounds (formula I) are designed with improved metabolic stability and pharmacokinetic profiles, making them suitable for clinical development unlike previous generation inhibitors that were ineffective or toxic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to optimize compounds for clinical use by adjusting molecular weight, lipophilicity, and other pharmacokinetic parameters. The structural modifications in formula I compounds improve bioavailability and reduce off-target effects, transforming laboratory inhibitors into clinically viable candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If non-selective LOX inhibitors are used, then LOX activity is inhibited, but off-target effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitor effectivenessVSAvoidoff-target effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing inhibitors with specific molecular structures (formula I) that target particular regions of the LOX enzyme active site. The compounds feature specific substituent patterns on the core structure that selectively interact with conserved residues in the catalytic domain, achieving high selectivity for LOX over other enzymes while maintaining potent inhibition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of non-selective inhibition into benefit by using structure-activity relationship analysis to identify selective binding modes. The compounds are designed to exploit specific structural features of LOX that are absent in other enzymes, transforming what could be non-selective binding into highly specific enzyme inhibition with favorable safety profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compounds effectively inhibit LOX and LOXL enzymes, offering potential therapeutic benefits for various conditions including cancer, fibrosis, and cardiovascular diseases, with improved selectivity and potency compared to existing inhibitors.

Implementation Method 1

compounds useful as lysyl oxidase (LOX) and lysyl oxidase-like (LOXL) family members (LOXL1, LOXL2, LOXL3, LOXL4) inhibitors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme inhibition: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

LOX (protein-6-lysine-oxidase; EC 1.4.3.13) is an extracellular enzyme that catalyses oxidative deamination of the primary amines of lysine and hydroxylysine in proteins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidative deamination: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12060360B2Lysyl oxidase inhibitors
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 THE INST OF CANCER RES ROYAL CANCER HOSPITAL
  • US12060360B2 patent drawing
  • US12060360B2 patent drawing
  • US12060360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to compounds useful as lysyl oxidase (LOX) and lysyl oxidase-like (LOXL) family member (LOXL1, LOXL2, LOXL3, LOXL4) inhibitors. In addition there are contemplated pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds and the use of the compounds in the treatment of conditions mediated by LOX and LOXL, for example cancer. In particular a LOX inhibitor such as the present compounds may be for use in the treatment of a cancer associated with EGFR. The present invention also contemplates the identification of biomarkers that predict responsiveness to a LOX inhibitor.