Loyalty Analytics System for Promotion Effectiveness Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturers and merchants face challenges in accurately calculating the return on investment for marketing efforts, particularly when advertisements are in the form of discounts or coupons, as it is difficult to determine the increase in sales directly attributable to these promotions.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method and system that utilize aggregated point-of-sale data to evaluate transaction activity after promotions, such as prepaid instruments or coupons, by tracking customer behavior and generating reports on subsequent transactions, including returns to the original merchant or other merchants, to assess the effectiveness of promotions in retaining customers and attracting new ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If aggregated point-of-sale data is used to track customer behavior after promotions, then measurement precision of promotion effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion effectiveness measurementVSAvoiddata aggregation and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A data aggregation and analysis system acts as an intermediary between point-of-sale terminals and marketers. The system collects transaction data from multiple POS terminals, processes it to identify promotion redemptions and subsequent customer behavior, and generates reports on promotion effectiveness. This intermediary approach enables precise measurement without requiring direct complex integration at each individual POS terminal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis process is segmented into distinct stages: data collection at POS terminals, data aggregation at a central system, promotion identification through pattern matching, customer behavior analysis, and report generation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and reduces overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If detailed tracking of customer transactions is implemented, then reliability of promotion effectiveness data is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion effectiveness dataVSAvoidcustomer data privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the specific information needed for promotion effectiveness analysis from transaction data. By focusing extraction on promotion identifiers, transaction timing, and merchant information rather than comprehensive customer profiles, the system maintains data reliability for analytical purposes while minimizing information loss and privacy concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that allow merchants to see promotion effectiveness metrics without exposing individual customer data. Aggregated reports show promotion performance trends and customer behavior patterns at the group level, enabling data-driven decisions while maintaining customer information privacy and reducing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8706543B2Loyalty analytics systems and methods
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 FIRST DATA CORP
  • US8706543B2 patent drawing
  • US8706543B2 patent drawing
  • US8706543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides the ability to evaluate transaction activity of customers following the redemption of a promotion, such as the redemption of a prepaid instrument, coupon, or the like. For example, the subsequent activity could be where customers shopped after redeeming a coupon. Examples of such reports that could be generated include the percentage of redeemers who returned to the same merchant or who went elsewhere. In some cases, customers could do both, or neither and the reports could indicate such activity. Further reports could show the amount spent for each return visit (both for those who return and go elsewhere), as well as the percentage who shop only with the merchant, and nowhere else.