Loyalty Climate Model for Customer Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Businesses face challenges in measuring and increasing customer loyalty due to the difficulty in identifying concrete actions to enhance loyalty and the lack of objective measurement methods, leading to inefficient strategies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system measures customer loyalty by analyzing survey responses through a loyalty climate model that characterizes relationships across multiple dimensions, providing a loyalty index and recommending practices to improve loyalty based on empirical data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional subjective methods are used to measure customer loyalty, then implementation is simple, but measurement precision is poor and cannot provide objective data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloyalty measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a loyalty climate model as an intermediary framework that translates subjective survey responses into objective loyalty measurements. The model acts as a mediator between the customer's perceptions and the quantifiable loyalty index, using multiple climate dimensions (trust, communication, conflict resolution, etc.) to objectively assess loyalty without requiring complex direct measurement of the loyalty concept itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical survey methods with a computer-implemented system that automatically processes survey responses through the loyalty climate model. The system uses software algorithms to calculate loyalty indices from survey data, substituting manual analysis with automated computational processing to achieve both precision and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive loyalty measurement is implemented, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases due to extensive data collection and analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloyalty measurement precisionVSAvoidtime for data collection and analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-structures the loyalty measurement framework by establishing the loyalty climate model with its multiple dimensions and indicators before data collection. Survey questions are designed in advance to map directly to the model's climate dimensions, allowing for efficient data processing. The system is prepared and configured beforehand to minimize analysis time when actual measurements are needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple climate dimensions are measured, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to the multifaceted assessment framework

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloyalty measurement precisionVSAvoidassessment framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex concept of loyalty into multiple distinct climate dimensions (trust, communication, conflict resolution, partnership orientation, etc.). Each dimension is measured separately through targeted survey questions, allowing the system to capture nuanced aspects of the relationship without overwhelming complexity. The segmented dimensions are then integrated to form a comprehensive loyalty assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the one-dimensional concept of loyalty into a multi-dimensional assessment framework by introducing multiple climate dimensions. This dimensional expansion allows for more precise measurement by evaluating loyalty from different angles (trust, communication, conflict resolution, etc.) rather than through a single metric, thereby improving measurement precision while managing complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If subjective survey responses are collected, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of objectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey administration easeVSAvoidobjectivity of measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where subjective survey responses are fed into the loyalty climate model, which then processes these inputs to generate objective loyalty indices. The system provides feedback to both the organization and customers about their loyalty climate, creating a closed-loop system that maintains ease of survey administration while improving measurement objectivity through structured processing and interpretation of the subjective data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8121853B2Loyalty measurement
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 SALESEQUITY COM INC
  • US8121853B2 patent drawing
  • US8121853B2 patent drawing
  • US8121853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system measures loyalty of one partner to another partner in a relationship, such as the loyalty of a company's customer to the company. The first partner's loyalty is measured by obtaining information from the partner, such as through answers to survey questions, about the partner's perception of the climate of the relationship. A loyalty index function may be applied to scores associated with the answers to produce a single loyalty index representing the first partner's loyalty to the other partner. The system may recommend that the second partner change their practices to increase the first partner's loyalty index. For example, the system may recommend that the second partner improve practices related to “satisfier” dimensions of the relationship, and/or that the second partner improve practices which empirical data have demonstrated to correlate most strongly with increased loyalty.