Loyalty Rewards Processing System for Complex Eligibility Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current loyalty rewards programs lack the capability to manage complex eligibility criteria and detailed transaction data, making it difficult for merchants to implement sophisticated reward structures and accurately track customer purchases, leading to inefficiencies in reward redemption and customer targeting.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an identification component, a transaction processing component, and a loyalty rewards processing component with rules and logic to identify individuals, determine eligible rewards based on multiple criteria, and store detailed transaction data, enabling merchants to manage complex loyalty programs and track customer purchases effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional loyalty rewards programs are used, then merchants can entice consumers to shop at their establishments, but the programs lack the capability to manage complex eligibility criteria and detailed transaction data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to manage complex eligibility criteriaVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the loyalty rewards program into distinct functional modules: eligibility criteria management, transaction data tracking, reward calculation, and redemption processing. Each module handles specific aspects of the program independently, allowing complex criteria to be managed through structured segmentation rather than monolithic system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a new dimensional layer of data storage and processing by implementing detailed line-item level transaction tracking. This adds depth to the data structure, enabling complex eligibility criteria evaluation without proportionally increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If merchants finance loyalty rewards programs themselves, then they can entice consumers to patronize their establishments, but it increases the financial burden on merchants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloyalty program functionalityVSAvoidfinancial burden on merchants
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces manufacturers/vendors as intermediary partners who contribute to funding loyalty rewards through product-level participation. This mediator approach allows merchants to share the financial burden with manufacturers while maintaining program functionality, as manufacturers gain product-specific promotional benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic adjustment of reward parameters and funding allocations based on transaction data and eligibility criteria. This allows flexible financial management where merchants can optimize their spending based on actual program performance and customer behavior patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If existing software systems are used for loyalty rewards, then reward redemption can be automated, but they focus on redemption rather than design and setup of how, when, and under what circumstances rewards are awarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward redemption automationVSAvoidreward program design capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive preliminary configuration capabilities that allow merchants to design and set up complex eligibility criteria, reward structures, and distribution rules before the program launches. This preliminary action phase enables sophisticated program design without compromising subsequent automation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides dynamic configuration options that allow reward program parameters, eligibility criteria, and distribution rules to be adjusted and modified based on performance data and changing business requirements, making the system adaptable while maintaining automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If loyalty programs track only basic customer identification, then system operation is simple, but they cannot accurately determine reward eligibility based on multiple criteria or track detailed transaction data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward eligibility determination accuracyVSAvoiddata tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality enhancement by implementing detailed tracking specifically for line-item level transaction data where it is most needed for eligibility determination. Rather than uniformly tracking all data at maximum detail, the system focuses precision where required for reward criteria evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual eligibility determination processes with automated computer-based evaluation of complex criteria. This substitution handles the complexity of multi-criteria assessment through algorithmic processing rather than manual analysis, reducing operational complexity despite increased data tracking requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11836744B2Loyalty rewards management and processing system and method
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 VALUECENTRIC MARKETING GROUP
  • US11836744B2 patent drawing
  • US11836744B2 patent drawing
  • US11836744B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for processing a transaction in connection with a loyalty rewards program comprising identifying at least one individual associated with said transaction, communicating associated information to a processing component that includes rules and logic associated with said loyalty rewards program, determining an eligible amount associated with said transaction for at least one promotion, determining at least one reward based on said eligible amount and said at least one promotion, and storing detailed, comprehensive, line item information associated with the transaction. Said system and method may further comprise determining an owed amount associated with at least one loyalty provider based on said rules and logic and charging said at least one loyalty provider for said owed amount. Such a system will facilitate marketing strategies, processing of returns, and management of cross-promotional arrangements, and will enable merchants to develop, implement, and manage complex loyalty rewards programs.