Relay Node Handover in LTE-Advanced Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In LTE-Advanced wireless communication systems, the introduction of relay nodes complicates handover processes due to uncertainties in interface operations, particularly with the X2 interface, leading to challenges in delivering messages to the correct relay node and determining appropriate handover types for user equipment.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that receive information from a relay node about new neighboring nodes, determine parameter information, establish connections if necessary, and manage access to these connections to facilitate handover processes, ensuring correct routing of messages and handover decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If relay nodes are introduced to extend coverage and enhance capacity, then coverage area and cell capacity are improved, but interface operation complexity and message delivery reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidmessage delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a proxy mechanism where the donor eNodeB acts as an intermediary for relay nodes. When a relay node needs to communicate with neighboring nodes, the donor eNodeB proxies these communications by sending messages to the correct relay node based on relay node identification information embedded in the messages. This resolves the reliability issue by ensuring messages are delivered to the correct relay node despite the complex multi-node interface operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If relay nodes are introduced to extend coverage and enhance capacity, then coverage area and cell capacity are improved, but device complexity and operation difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidinterface operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The donor eNodeB serves as a mediator that simplifies interface operations for relay nodes. Instead of requiring each relay node to directly manage complex point-to-point X2 interfaces with multiple neighboring nodes, the donor eNodeB centralizes this functionality by proxying communications and making handover decisions based on relay node identification information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the X2 interface to function in multiple modes: direct point-to-point communication between eNodeBs and proxied communication through donor eNodeBs for relay nodes. This multi-functionality allows the same interface infrastructure to support both traditional and relay-based architectures without requiring separate complex management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If relay nodes share eNB identification with donor base station, then neighbor node identification and communication are simplified, but handover type determination and message routing become uncertain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneighbor identification easeVSAvoidhandover decision reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different identification rules at different levels: relay nodes share the donor eNodeB's eNB ID for neighbor discovery and initial communication (simplifying operations), but include specific relay node identification information in messages for precise routing and handover decisions (ensuring reliability). This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between ease of operation and decision reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If X2 interface operates as point-to-point as originally designed, then interface simplicity is maintained, but relay node message delivery and handover initiation become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface design simplicityVSAvoidrelay handover operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The X2 interface is designed to support both traditional point-to-point eNodeB communications and proxied relay node communications through the donor eNodeB. This multi-functionality allows the interface to maintain its original simple point-to-point design while accommodating relay nodes by having the donor eNodeB act as an intermediary that forwards messages to the appropriate relay nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2586242B1Relaying communications in advanced LTE systems
Publication Date: 2020.05.20 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • EP2586242B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2586242B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2586242B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is a method comprising receiving information from a relay node associated with a first node. The information comprises an indication of at least one second node. The method also comprises determining parameter information of the at least one second node on the basis of the indication.