Sounding Resource Allocation in LTE Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High cell loads in LTE wireless communication systems make it impractical to provide rich channel state information (CSI) to all mobile devices, leading to excessive signaling overhead and inefficient allocation of sounding reference symbol (SRS) resources, particularly affecting cell edge users and increasing the risk of radio link failures.

Innovation Solution

A computing apparatus determines device states based on various criteria such as transmit buffer data, traffic type, and resource block usage to dynamically allocate richer sounding configurations to mobile devices that can benefit most, while minimizing radio resource control reconfigurations and swapping resources between devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rich CSI signaling is provided to all on-line mobile devices to achieve good frequency selective scheduling, then frequency selective scheduling performance is improved, but signaling overhead becomes excessive and SRS resources are exhausted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency selective scheduling performanceVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the level of CSI signaling provided to different mobile devices based on their location and characteristics. Cell edge devices receive rich CSI signaling while cell center devices receive reduced signaling, optimizing the balance between scheduling performance and signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by providing rich CSI signaling only to a subset of mobile devices (specifically cell edge devices) rather than all on-line devices. This selective approach maintains sufficient scheduling performance for critical users while reducing overall signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If frequent sounding is performed to maintain accurate frequency specific CSI across multiple scheduling periods, then CSI accuracy is improved, but SRS resources are exhausted and cell uplink throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency specific CSI accuracyVSAvoidcell uplink throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating sounding frequency based on device location and mobility characteristics. Cell edge devices with higher mobility receive more frequent sounding while cell center devices receive less frequent sounding, optimizing CSI accuracy where needed without wasting resources elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial sounding action by performing frequent sounding only for a subset of mobile devices that require it (cell edge devices) rather than all devices. This maintains necessary CSI accuracy for critical users while preserving SRS resources for other purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If RRC connection reconfiguration is used to change sounding configuration for mobile devices, then sounding resource allocation is optimized, but radio link failure risk increases especially for cell edge devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesounding resource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidradio link stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple sounding reference symbol configurations with different resource allocations before they are needed. The network can then switch between these pre-configured options based on current device conditions without requiring complex real-time reconfiguration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic sounding configuration selection where the network dynamically chooses between multiple pre-configured SRS configurations based on real-time device conditions such as mobility and location, rather than performing static reconfiguration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If frequent RRC connection reconfigurations are performed to optimize sounding configuration, then sounding resource allocation is improved, but device complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesounding resource allocation optimizationVSAvoidRRC connection reconfiguration frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing multiple sounding configurations in advance with different resource allocation levels. This allows the network to switch between configurations based on device needs without performing complex reconfiguration procedures, reducing RRC signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying sounding configuration parameters (such as sounding reference symbol allocation) through more efficient mechanisms that reduce the frequency and complexity of RRC connection reconfigurations while maintaining optimal resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10476644B2Method and apparatus for allocating sounding resources in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 HONOR DEVICE CO LTD
  • US10476644B2 patent drawing
  • US10476644B2 patent drawing
  • US10476644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing apparatus for allocating sounding resources in an access node of a wireless network. The computing apparatus comprises a processor configured to determine a first device state based on a device state model and first device information, wherein the first device state model includes a finite number of states. The processor is configured to determine a first target sounding configuration for the first device information based on the first device state, and output the first target sounding configuration.