In-Device Coexistence Interference Mitigation in LTE-WLAN Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-device coexistence interference occurs when multiple wireless technologies, such as LTE and WLAN, operate simultaneously, leading to communication quality, reliability, and throughput issues due to adjacent channel interference and spurious emissions, with existing solutions failing to effectively mitigate these problems in LTE-WLAN aggregation and interworking scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of measures to detect and mitigate in-device coexistence interference includes channel reconfiguration, deactivation of LTE-WLAN aggregation, and providing IDC indications to the eNB, allowing UEs to autonomously manage coexistence by avoiding interfering channels and configurations, and the eNB modifying settings to prevent interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple wireless technologies (LTE and WLAN) operate simultaneously in adjacent bands, then radio resource utilization and communication throughput are improved, but in-device coexistence interference increases causing communication quality and reliability degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication throughputVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UE monitors for IDC interference conditions and provides feedback to the eNB through IDC indication messages. The eNB uses this feedback information to adjust resource allocation and configuration parameters, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to interference conditions and maintains communication quality while preserving throughput opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operational parameters based on detected interference conditions. When IDC interference is detected, the eNB modifies resource allocation, transmission parameters, and channel configuration in real-time to mitigate interference effects, allowing the system to adapt between high-throughput modes and interference-avoidance modes as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If LTE-WLAN aggregation and interworking are implemented to enhance communication capabilities, then network flexibility and service quality are improved, but in-device coexistence interference problems increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork flexibilityVSAvoidin-device coexistence interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and assessment of IDC interference conditions before initiating LTE-WLAN aggregation or interworking operations. The UE evaluates potential interference scenarios in advance and provides indication messages to the eNB, allowing the network to pre-configure appropriate parameters and avoid harmful interference situations before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The eNB acts as an intermediary coordinator between LTE and WLAN operations. It receives IDC indication messages from the UE, processes the interference information, and mediates the conflict by adjusting resource allocation and configuration parameters to enable LTE-WLAN aggregation and interworking while mitigating the harmful interference effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If autonomous UE-based IDC mitigation measures are implemented, then interference management flexibility is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference management flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UE autonomously monitors its own radio environment, detects IDC interference conditions, and generates IDC indication messages without requiring constant network control. This self-service capability allows the UE to independently manage its interference situation while the eNB provides higher-level coordination, distributing the complexity management between device and network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10840967B2Reduction of in-device coexistence interference
Publication Date: 2020.11.17 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US10840967B2 patent drawing
  • US10840967B2 patent drawing
  • US10840967B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided measures for reduction of in-device co-existence interference. Such measures exemplarily comprise (in a mobile network scenario allowing co-operation of a first radio access technology with a second radio access technology) detecting a need to avoid an in-device co-existence interference in relation to said co-operation, and performing at least one action for avoiding the in-device co-existence interference.