Radio Resource Availability Indication for LTE-WLAN Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication systems face challenges in effectively interacting and resource management between different radio access technologies, leading to inefficient data handling and increased signaling costs due to the lack of real-time resource availability information.

Innovation Solution

A method where a network node in a first radio access technology can request and receive resource availability information from a second radio access technology, allowing informed decisions on activating or continuing resource aggregation, thereby conserving resources and reducing signaling costs by assessing the second RAT's ability to meet Quality of Service (QoS) parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resource aggregation is activated between different radio access technologies, then data transmission capacity is improved, but signaling costs and resource management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission capacityVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the WLAN network node proactively report available resource information to the LTE network node before resource aggregation is activated. This allows the LTE network node to make informed decisions about aggregation activation without needing to continuously query or manage WLAN resources, thereby reducing signaling overhead and management complexity while maintaining high data transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If user plane tunnel is established between LTE and WLAN, then resource aggregation capability is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource aggregation capabilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the resource availability information reporting function from the resource aggregation establishment process. Instead of requiring extensive signaling to negotiate and confirm resource availability during tunnel establishment, the WLAN network node independently reports its available resources in advance. This separation reduces the signaling overhead associated with user plane tunnel establishment while maintaining full resource aggregation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If real-time resource availability information is exchanged between radio access technologies, then network performance is improved, but communication protocol complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidcommunication protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the Xw interface as an intermediary mechanism between LTE and WLAN networks. The standardized Xw interface provides a predefined protocol framework for resource availability information exchange, eliminating the need for complex custom protocols. This intermediary approach ensures reliable network performance through structured information exchange while keeping protocol complexity manageable through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3190828B1Method of indication of available radio resources
Publication Date: 2020.05.27 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • EP3190828B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3190828B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3190828B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Various communication systems may benefit from communication between two different radio access technologies. For example, a long term evolution network may benefit from receiving resource availability information from a wireless local area network. A method includes receiving a request from a first RAT at a network node in a second RAT, and at least partially rejecting or at least partially accepting the request. The method also includes sending an indication of the at least partial rejection or at least partial acceptance to the first radio access technology, where the indication is used in determining whether to activate or continue radio access aggregation.