Lubricated Soil Mixing Tools Reduce Wear and Energy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deep soil mixing technologies are inefficient, wasteful, and costly due to high energy consumption, significant tool wear, and sensitivity to dense or stiff soils, leading to suboptimal soil conditioning and mixing results.

Innovation Solution

The use of soil mixing tools equipped with drilling tools, cutting wheels, and nozzles that inject industrial lubricating foam, polymers, anti-clay agents, and colloidal systems containing phyllosilicates, granulated blast furnace slag, or cement to condition and strengthen soil, reducing density and improving soil properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional deep soil mixing technologies are used, then soil mixing can be achieved, but energy consumption is high and tool wear is significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidtool wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A lubricating foam is introduced as an intermediary substance between the cutting tools and soil. This foam reduces friction and wear on the tools while also conditioning the soil, thereby resolving the contradiction between achieving effective soil mixing and minimizing tool wear and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The physical and chemical parameters of the soil are changed by introducing the lubricating foam, which modifies soil density, viscosity, and friction characteristics. This parameter change enables more efficient mixing with reduced tool wear and lower energy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional soil mixing methods are used, then mixing can be performed, but the methods are sensitive to dense or stiff soils and organics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil type sensitivityVSAvoidmixing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lubricating foam acts as a mediator that conditions the soil before mixing, making the mixing process less sensitive to soil type. It reduces the impact of dense, stiff soils and organics on mixing effectiveness, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining reliable mixing quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The lubricating foam is applied preliminarily to the soil before the actual mixing operation. This preliminary conditioning prepares the soil by reducing its density and improving its workability, making subsequent mixing more effective regardless of soil type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If current deep mixing equipment is used, then soil mixing is achieved, but equipment requirements are large and heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoidequipment weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lubricating foam enables more efficient soil conditioning and mixing, which allows the use of lighter equipment. By reducing the friction and resistance during mixing, the system achieves high productivity with reduced equipment weight and smaller mobilization costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances soil malleability, reduces tool wear, decreases energy requirements, and improves the quality of mixed soil, leading to cost savings and more efficient soil conditioning and mixing processes.

Implementation Method 1

at least one tool advance additive (TAA) including an industrial lubricating foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 2

at least one colloidal system comprising phyllosilicates, granulated ground blast furnace slag, cement or a combination thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

at least one colloidal system comprising phyllosilicates, granulated ground blast furnace slag, cement or a combination thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCohesion: Cohesion

Implementation Method 4

These processes are aided by a number of techniques including introduction of dry binders, high pressure water jetting, addition of compressed air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 5

These processes are aided by a number of techniques including introduction of dry binders, high pressure water jetting, addition of compressed air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10557242B2Lubricated soil mixing systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 KRUSE GMBH & CO KG
  • US10557242B2 patent drawing
  • US10557242B2 patent drawing
  • US10557242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are tools, systems and methods for conditioning, strengthening and/or improving in situ soil geotechnical or agricultural properties while at least temporarily reducing soil density, energy requirements, and tool wear.