Video Block Prediction Using Luma-Chroma Gradients

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video coding technologies, such as MPEG-2, MPEG-4, ITU-T.263, ITU-T.264/MPEG-4 AVC, ITU-T.265 HEVC, and VVC, require improvements in coding quality for digital video processing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a cross-component prediction scheme to adjust the prediction for video blocks, enhancing the coding quality by utilizing a cross-component prediction scheme in video processing methods, apparatuses, and storage media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional video coding technologies (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, VVC) are used, then video compression is achieved, but coding quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding qualityVSAvoidvideo information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the prediction offset based on gradient calculations. Specifically, it modifies the luma prediction signal by adding an offset derived from the gradient between luma and chroma components, thereby changing the prediction parameters to improve coding quality and reduce information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional prediction mechanisms with a gradient-based prediction mechanism. Instead of using standard intra or inter prediction methods, it substitutes a new mechanism that calculates gradients between luma and chroma components and uses these gradients to adjust prediction values, improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If cross-component prediction scheme is implemented, then coding quality is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction process into distinct stages: gradient calculation stage, offset determination stage, and prediction adjustment stage. By dividing the complex cross-component prediction into manageable segments, it reduces processing complexity while maintaining coding quality improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating gradients between luma and chroma components before the actual prediction process. This preliminary gradient calculation allows for more efficient prediction adjustments during encoding, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250317552A1Method, apparatus, and medium for video processing
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 BYTEDANCE INC
  • US20250317552A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317552A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317552A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a solution for video processing. A method for video processing is proposed. The method comprises: adjusting, for a conversion between a current video block of a video and a bitstream of the video, a prediction for the current video block, the prediction being determined based on a cross-component prediction scheme; and performing the conversion based on the adjusted prediction.