Luminescent Local Defects in Silicon for Quantum State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing systems face challenges in efficiently utilizing defects in semiconductor materials for quantum computing and communication due to the complexity of managing local degrees of freedom and optical transitions associated with luminescence centers, which affect the reliability and efficiency of quantum operations.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a semiconductor material with luminescence centers and local defects, such as G-centers, T-centers, and M-centers, to store and manipulate information using optical transitions modified by local degrees of freedom, specifically spin, enabling reliable state preparation, low decoherence rates, and accurate quantum gate operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If luminescence centers with local degrees of freedom are used for quantum information processing, then quantum state stability and coherence are improved, but the complexity of managing local degrees of freedom and optical transitions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum state stabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of managing local degrees of freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates specific luminescence centers (such as G-centers, T-centers, M-centers) from the semiconductor material, treating them as discrete quantum systems with well-defined local degrees of freedom. This extraction allows for controlled manipulation of individual defect states while separating them from the complex bulk material environment, thereby reducing the overall management complexity while maintaining quantum state stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by focusing on specific localized defect regions within the semiconductor material rather than treating the entire material uniformly. Each luminescence center is characterized by its specific local electronic structure and degree of freedom (spin, orbital, etc.), allowing tailored control and manipulation of quantum states at each location while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If optical transitions modified by local degrees of freedom are utilized, then quantum gate operations become more precise, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring optical states increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of quantum gate operationsVSAvoiddifficulty of detecting optical states
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces optical transitions as intermediary mechanisms that couple the local degrees of freedom (spin, orbital states) to detectable optical signals. By mediating the connection between internal quantum states and external measurements through these optical transitions, the system achieves precise control of quantum gates while maintaining accessible measurement channels for detecting the resulting states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If defects in semiconductor materials are used for quantum computing, then quantum information storage capability is improved, but the reliability of quantum operations is reduced due to decoherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum information storage capabilityVSAvoidquantum operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key parameters of the defect states, specifically selecting luminescence centers with appropriate energy level structures and local degree of freedom configurations. By optimizing parameters such as the energy separation between states, the nature of local degrees of freedom (spin vs. orbital), and the coupling strengths, the system achieves both versatile quantum information storage and reliable quantum operations with reduced decoherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency and reliability of quantum computing and communication by stabilizing quantum states and enabling precise control over quantum gates, thereby improving the performance of quantum processors and communication devices.

Implementation Method 1

one or more luminescence centres disposed in the body of semiconductor material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLuminescence: Luminescence

Implementation Method 2

A respective optical degree of freedom is associated with a respective luminescence centre. A respective local degree of freedom is associated with a respective luminescence centre. The one or more local degrees of freedom modify the one or more optical degrees of freedom.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical transition: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12464861B2Systems, devices, articles and methods including luminescent local defects in semiconductors with local information states
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 PHOTONIC INC
  • US12464861B2 patent drawing
  • US12464861B2 patent drawing
  • US12464861B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device, such as, an information processing or communications device, including a body of semiconductor material consisting principally of silicon, one or more luminescence centres disposed in the body of semiconductor material, one or more optical degrees of freedom associated with the one or more luminescence centres, and one or more local degrees of freedom associated with the one or more luminescence centres. A respective optical degree of freedom is associated with a respective luminescence centre. A respective local degree of freedom is associated with a respective luminescence centre. The one or more local degrees of freedom modify the one or more optical degrees of freedom.