Lurasidone Synthesis Using Protic Solvent Mixture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for synthesizing Lurasidone and its intermediates rely on toxic and costly solvents like acetonitrile, requiring high temperatures and complex workup procedures, making them industrially inefficient and environmentally unfriendly.

Innovation Solution

A process using a mixture of protic solvents, specifically an alcoholic solvent and water, in the presence of a base to react compounds III and IV, achieving high yield and purity of (3aR,7aR)-4′-(benzo[d]isothiazol-3-yl)octahydrospiro[isoindole-2,1′-piperazin]-1′-ium methanesulfonate, which is then converted into Lurasidone, eliminating the need for toxic solvents and harsh purification steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If acetonitrile is used as solvent in the synthesis process, then the reaction can proceed, but the process becomes toxic and environmentally unfriendly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solvent parameter from acetonitrile to a mixture of protic solvents (alcoholic solvent and water). This parameter change eliminates toxicity while maintaining the reaction's manufacturability, as the protic solvent mixture allows the quaternary ammonium salt formation to proceed effectively without harmful substances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If acetonitrile is used as solvent, then the synthesis can be performed, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive acetonitrile with a cost-effective mixture of protic solvents (alcoholic solvent and water). These cheaper solvents maintain the necessary reaction conditions for synthesizing the quaternary ammonium salt, significantly reducing material costs while preserving manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If high temperature is used for the reaction, then the reaction rate increases, but the workup procedure becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidworkup procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solvent system parameter to a mixture of protic solvents, which enables the reaction to proceed at moderate temperatures with improved reaction rates. This parameter change simultaneously simplifies the workup procedure by improving product solubility and facilitating easier separation, thus resolving the contradiction between reaction rate and workup complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional solvents are used, then the synthesis process is established, but the purity of the product decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess establishedVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solvent parameter from conventional acetonitrile to a mixture of protic solvents (alcoholic solvent and water). This parameter change enhances product purity by improving solubility characteristics and facilitating better separation during workup, while the process remains manufacturable using these alternative solvents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a yield of 85-90% with ≥99% purity, reducing impurities to less than 0.06% and eliminating the use of toxic solvents, making it environmentally friendly and cost-effective for large-scale production.

Implementation Method 1

reacting the compound-III with the compound-IV in a mixture of protic solvents; in the presence of a base to obtain the compound II

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

reacting the compound-III with the compound-IV in a mixture of protic solvents consisting of an alcoholic solvent and water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS10196400B2Process for the preparation of lurasidone and its intermediate
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 PIRAMAL PHARMA LTD
  • US10196400B2 patent drawing
  • US10196400B2 patent drawing
  • US10196400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an improved process for preparation of the substantially pure (3aR,7aR)-4′-(benzo[d]isothiazol-3-yl)octahydrospiro[isoindole-2,1′-piperazin]-1′-ium methanesulfonate (referred to as compound-II), which is useful as a key intermediate for the synthesis of lurasidone ((3aR,4S,7R,7aS)-2-{(1R,2R)-2-[4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)piperazin-1ylmethyl]cyclohexylmethyl}hexahydro-4,7-methano-2H-isoindole-1,3-dione). The process comprises reaction of the compound-III (as described herein) with the compound-IV (as described herein) in the presence of a solvent mixture selected from an alcohol and water; and a base The improved process for the preparation of compound II provides the product with total amount of unreacted compound-IV as impurity in less than 0.06% and the product with HPLC purity as ≥99.8%. The process further refers purification of Lurasidone hydrochloride, wherein the product contains the residual acetone <5000 ppm.